A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.
Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
The dialogue between Huang and Suarez most strongly supports the claim that they disagree about whether
the best way to reduce
10% picked this
people who commit violent crimes
3% picked this
people who commit violent crimes
3% picked this
mandatory sentences will deter most
Why this is right
Answer D is correct.
Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
84% picked this
severe penalties reduce the incidence
0% picked this
Continue the review in LSAT Lab
Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.
Turn this review into a targeted study plan.
Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.