Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT128 S3 Q5 Explanation

Those who participate in risky

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Those who participate in risky sports often do so to confront their fears. For example, rock climbers are more likely than others to have once suffered from a fear of heights. Those who participate in such risk-taking activities also have more true that confronting one's fears increases one's self-confidence.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact9% picked this

    Often those who suffer from fears such as a fear of heights either do not know that they suffer from those fears or do

    The author wasn't assuming that people who suffer from fear of heights almost always have a correct self-assessment of that fear, so it doesn't hurt her argument to say that people often don't have a correct self-assessment. This answer isn't related to either of two goals: 1. suggest an alternate explanation for why "people who play risky sports have high self-confidence" 2. hurt the plausibility of the storyline that "many people play a risky sport, in doing so confront a fear, and because of that get a boost to their self-confidence".

  2. Correct85% picked this

    In general, people who currently participate in risky sports had above-average self-confidence even before participating

    Why this is right

    This performs the 1st of our two possible goals: 1. suggest an alternate explanation for why "people who play risky sports have high self-confidence" 2. hurt the plausibility of the storyline that "many people play a risky sport, in doing so confront a fear, and because of that get a boost to their self-confidence". We get to say, "Hey, author the reason you're seeing that people who participate in risky sports have high self-confidence isn't because first they started doing risky activities, then confronting their fears caused a boost to their self-confidence. It's because first they had high-confidence, and then that led them to take on a risky activity that confronts their fear." In other words, this answer provides the alternate explanation of Reverse Causality, for the correlation between "risky sport participant" and "high self-confidence".

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact3% picked this

    Most people who refrain from engaging in risky sports refrain from doing so for reasons other than a

    We don't really have any interest in people who don't play risky sports. We already know that they have less self-confidence on average than those who do play risky sports. We don't care for what reason it is that they're not engaging in risky sports. We need an answer to perform one of these two functions, both of which are about people who do play risky sports. 1. suggest an alternate explanation for why "people who play risky sports have high self-confidence" 2. hurt the plausibility of the storyline that "many people play a risky sport, in doing so confront a fear, and because of that get a boost to their self-confidence".

  4. No Impact3% picked this

    Participating in risky sports is not the only way to confront

    An answer this weak, "there's at least one other example", would usually not be correct on any problem that wants the most impactful answer (Strengthen, Weaken, Paradox, Suff Assump). Saying that there are other ways to confront fears besides risky sports performs neither of our two goals: 1. suggest an alternate explanation for why "people who play risky sports have high self-confidence" 2. hurt the plausibility of the storyline that "many people play a risky sport, in doing so confront a fear, and because of that get a boost to their self-confidence".

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    Most of those who do not participate in risky sports believe that they lack the capacity to

    We don't really have any interest in people who don't play risky sports. We don't care for what reason it is that they're not engaging in risky sports. We need an answer to perform one of these two functions, both of which are about people who do play risky sports. 1. suggest an alternate explanation for why "people who play risky sports have high self-confidence" 2. hurt the plausibility of the storyline that "many people play a risky sport, in doing so confront a fear, and because of that get a boost to their self-confidence".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free