Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT128 S1 P4 Q28 Explanation

Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.

Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.

In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.

In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.

There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, "metaphorical examples of riddled be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
28.

Which one of the following is most clearly one of the "metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction" mentioned

Answer choices

  1. Contradiction17% picked this

    A scientist is unable to determine if mixing certain chemicals will result in a particular chemical reaction because the reaction cannot be consistently reproduced

    The starting conditions are not always exactly the same due to small, inadvertent, and undetectable changes (first paragraph).

  2. Correct51% picked this

    A scientist is unable to determine if mixing certain chemicals will result in a particular chemical reaction because the reaction cannot be consistently reproduced

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the first paragraph.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong18% picked this

    A scientist is unable to determine if mixing certain chemicals will result in a particular chemical reaction because the reaction cannot be consistently reproduced

    It’s impossible to produce starting conditions that are exactly the same (first paragraph), but that’s not the same as producing ones that are even approximately the same.

  4. Contradiction8% picked this

    A scientist is able to determine that mixing certain chemicals results in a particular chemical reaction because it is possible to consistently reproduce the

    A metaphorical riddled basin of attraction would make it impossible for the scientist to make a determination (first paragraph).

  5. Contradiction5% picked this

    A scientist is able to determine that mixing certain chemicals results in a particular chemical reaction because it is possible to consistently reproduce the

    A metaphorical riddled basin of attraction would make it impossible for the scientist to make a determination (first paragraph).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free