Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT128 S1 P4 Q22 Explanation

Riddled Basins of Attraction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.

Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.

In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.

In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.

There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, "metaphorical examples of riddled be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong6% picked this

    Sommerer and Ott's model suggests that many of the fundamental experimental results of science are unreliable because they are contaminated

    First, it is possible that those results are contaminated with riddled basins of attraction but not ensured (fifth paragraph). And second, this only matters if Sommerer and Ott’s model is correct.

  2. Correct61% picked this

    Sommerer and Ott's model suggests that scientists who fail to replicate experimental results might be working within physical systems

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the first paragraph.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong24% picked this

    Sommerer and Ott's model suggests that experimental results can never be truly replicated because the starting conditions of an experiment

    It is possible that experimental results might not always be replicable (fourth paragraph), but to say that they are never replicable goes too far.

  4. Too Strong7% picked this

    Sommerer and Ott's model suggests that most of the physical systems studied by scientists are in fact metaphorical examples

    The passage does not indicate how many of the physical systems studied by scientists are metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction (fourth paragraph).

  5. Unsupported3% picked this

    Sommerer and Ott's model suggests that an experimental result should not be treated as credible unless that

    It is a foundation of scientific research (and not Sommerer and Ott’s model) that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated (first paragraph).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free