Logical Reasoning

PT127 · S3 · Q9 There are far fewer independent

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

There are far fewer independent bookstores than there were 20 years ago, largely because chain bookstores prospered and multiplied during that time.

Evidence

There are far fewer independent ↑CB -cause→ ↓IB bookstores than there were 20 years ago, largely because chain bookstores prospered and multiplied during that time.

The shortage of independent ↓IB -cause→ ↓VB bookstores has prevented the variety of readily available books from growing as much as it otherwise would have.

Conclusion

Chain bookstores’ success has ↓CB -cause→ ↓BC been to the detriment of book consumers.

Evaluate

The argument assumes that a ↓VB -cause→ ↓BC reduction in the variety of books available to consumers is to their [book consumers] detriment.

9.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

  1. Correct

    Book consumers would be better

    Why this is right

    This links a reduction in ↓VB -cause→ ↓BC the variety of books available to consumers and something to the detriment of those [book] consumers.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    72% picked this

  2. Independent bookstores typically do not

    Weakens

    This makes it less likely that chain bookstores' success has been to the detriment of book consumers.

    26% picked this

  3. The average bookstore today is

    Weakens

    While the impact of this answer is very weak, it does make it less likely that chain bookstores' success has been to the detriment of book consumers.

    0% picked this

  4. The average bookstore today is

    Too Strong

    While this might support the argument, it is not necessary to it. It could be true that there is less variety of books, even though the average bookstore is larger then it was 20 years ago.

    1% picked this

  5. Some book consumers value low

    Out of Scope

    Low prices are not discussed in the argument and it doesn't appear obvious whether low prices are more common in independent bookstores or chain bookstores.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free