Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT124 S2 Q19 Explanation

Renting cars from dealerships is

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Renting cars from dealerships is less expensive than renting cars from national rental firms. But to take advantage of dealership rates, tourists must determine which local dealerships offer rentals, and then pay for long taxi rides between the airport and those dealerships. So renting generally more worthwhile for local residents than for tourists.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Each of the following, if true, strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens5% picked this

    To encourage future business, many car dealerships drop off and pick up rental cars for local

    This establishes a difference between locals and tourists. For locals, who might use this dealership more than once (future business), there is free transportation to/from the dealership.

  2. Strengthens18% picked this

    Tourists renting cars from national rental firms almost never need to pay for taxi rides to

    This establishes a difference between dealerships and national firms: the argument is assuming that it's easier to find the national firms and cheaper to transport yourself there. This answer provides that latter assumption.

  3. Strengthens8% picked this

    Travel agents generally are unable to inform tourists of which local car

    This rules out an objection. We might have objected, "So what if tourists have to determine which dealerships offer rentals? Is that hard?" This answer pushes us in the direction of, "Yes, it is kinda hard. Travel agents are usually not able to inform tourists of which dealerships they should contact." (If this question were on a modern test, it would say that The websites of dealerships usually do not indicate whether or not they offer rentals)

  4. Strengthens4% picked this

    Many local residents know of local car dealerships that offer

    This establishes one of the assumed differences. The author has to think that the challenge of determining eligible dealerships is easier for a local than for a tourist. This helps to establish that distinction.

  5. Correct65% picked this

    For local residents, taxi rides to car dealerships from their homes or workplaces are usually no less expensive than taxi

    Why this is right

    The author was assuming a difference when it came to locals vs. tourists, in terms of how costly it would be for tourists to get to a dealership vs. get to a national rental firm. The author thought, "for tourists (coming from the airport), it's a long taxi ride to a dealership (whereas she assumed it was a shorter ride, if any, to a national firm". Did the author assume a comparison for locals, when it comes to drive time? Well, sure -- if the author thinks that dealership rentals are more worthwhile for locals, she is seemingly assuming that for locals, "it is NOT a longer ride to dealership than to national firm". This answer is phrased in a way that is saying "usually, for locals, the taxi ride to a dealership is AT LEAST AS MUCH money as the taxi ride to a national firm." If they're tied, then a dealership is still probably a better value (since they offer cheaper rentals), but this answer doesn't say the taxi ride is tied. It says "the taxi ride to a dealership usually isn't cheaper!" That seems to undercut one of the potential ways in which it would be more worthwhile for a local than a tourist to rent from a dealership.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free