Reading Comprehension

PT123 · S1 · P1 · Q3 Course Packs and Copyrights

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In a recent court case, a copy-shop owner was accused of violating copyright law when, in the preparation of “course packs”—materials photocopied from books and journals and packaged as readings for particular university courses—he copied materials without obtaining permission from or paying sufficient fees to the publishers.

Topic

A court case about whether a copy-shop owner violated copyright law by making and selling educational course packs without publisher permission.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

The court ruled that the copy-shop’s production of course packs for educational purposes did not violate copyright law, even though the owner profited, because the copying was not an exploitation of the copyrighted content itself. (Most valuable sentence appears at the end of paragraph 2: )

P1: Introducing the Case and Arguments

A copy-shop owner was accused of violating copyright law by selling course packs without permission or proper payment. He argued that getting permission is too hard and expensive, and that course packs let professors assign readings that students couldn’t otherwise afford. The twist: the shop made profits on these packs, which made this case different from the usual classroom "fair use" situations.

P2: Copyright Law, Publishers’ Arguments, and the Court’s Decision

Copyright law considers several factors to judge if copying material is fair—such as whether it’s for commercial or educational use, and how much it affects the market value of the work. The publishers said if copy shops stop paying fees, the value of scholarly works will drop. But the court found no real threat to the market and said it was more important that the copies were for education. The shop owner’s profit didn’t matter since the fee was based on number of pages copied, not the material's content.

P3: Court’s Reasoning and Final Takeaway

The court saw the copy shop’s actions as simply providing a service that makes copying easier and cheaper—not as taking unfair advantage of the authors’ creative work. Professors and students would be allowed to make these copies themselves, so it’s OK for them to use a third party like a copy shop to do it efficiently.

3.

The copy-shop owner as described in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. The potential market value of

    Trap

    3% picked this

  2. Publishers are always opposed to

    Trap

    1% picked this

  3. Correct

    More copy shops would likely

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    94% picked this

  4. Certain provisions of copyright law

    Trap

    2% picked this

  5. Copy shops make more of

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free