Logical Reasoning

PT122 · S4 · Q25 A study conducted over a

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A study conducted over a 6-month period analyzed daily attendance and average length of visit at the local art museum.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

25.

Each of the following, if true, could help to explain the differing average lengths of visits to the museum EXCEPT:

  1. Visitors to the museum during

    Trap

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    A plan to extend normal

    Why this is right

    Answer B is correct.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    83% picked this

  3. Many people who go to

    Trap

    8% picked this

  4. Admission tickets to the special

    Trap

    4% picked this

  5. Many people who go to

    Trap

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free