Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT122 S2 Q20 Explanation

Environmentalist: Discarding old appliances

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Environmentalist: Discarding old appliances can be dangerous: refrigerators contain chlorofluorocarbons; electronic circuit boards and cathode-ray tubes often contain heavy metals like lead; and old fluorescent bulbs contain mercury, another heavy metal. When landfills are operated properly, such materials pose no threat. However, when landfills are not operated properly, lead and mercury from is incinerated, heavy metals poison the ash and escape into the air.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The environmentalist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: recycled1% picked this

    Old fluorescent bulbs should be

    The concept of "recycling" old fluorescent bulbs was never discussed. It's hard to support the idea that we should do that, when we don't even know if it's an option. Furthermore, we have reason to think that we have a viable way to deal with old fluorescent bulbs if we put them in a properly operated landfill, where the mercury in them poses no threat.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    Appliances containing heavy metals should not

    Why this is right

    This ends up being our most supportable answer, even though it's surprisingly adrift from language offered in the stimulus. The idea of "should" was never discussed. But it's pretty common sense to think that "we should not do things that result in bad things". We're told that incinerating appliances with heavy metals would cause heavy metals to escape into the air. We know we don't want to breathe in lead and mercury, so if incinerating an appliance would lead to that, then it's pretty reasonable to say, "We should not do that". It's easier to support that we shouldn't do this thing the paragraph told us had bad consequences than it is to support (A) which is saying we should do something we weren't told anything about.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: atmosphere10% picked this

    Chlorofluorocarbons are harmful to the

    This is a mean outside knowledge trap. Yes, CFC's are really harmful to the atmosphere. Some of us may have even read the RC passage about the way they destroy the ozone layer. But there's no support within this paragraph of the idea that CFC's are harmful to the atmosphere.

  4. Out of Scope0% picked this

    Newer appliances are more dangerous to the environment than

    Out of Scope: newer appliances Opposite, if anything The passage only addresses older appliances and does so in order to tell us about the dangers they pose. So not only have we heard nothing about newer appliances, but the information we have so far sounds like older appliances are scary.

  5. Too Strong: no appliances in landfills8% picked this

    Appliances should be kept out of

    This sort of goes starkly against the 2nd sentence, which tells us that when landfills are operated properly, the materials found in appliances pose no threat.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free