Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT122 S1 Q5 Explanation

Statistician: Two major studies found

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Statistician: Two major studies found no causal link between medical procedure X and disorder Y, but these studies are flawed. One study looked at 1,000 people who had undergone procedure X and the other study looked at 1,100 people who had undergone procedure X. But because disorder Y occurs in only .02 study to detect even a doubling of the rate of disorder Y.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong4% picked this

    Contrary to the findings of two major studies, there is reason to think that procedure

    This answer implies that there is a reason to think procedure X causes disorder Y, which goes beyond what the statistician argues. The argument only claims that the studies are flawed due to sample size issues, not that the studies have claimed something false.

  2. Correct73% picked this

    Two studies that discovered no causal link between procedure X and disorder

    Why this is right

    This answer matches the conclusion. It is supported by the discussion of methodological flaws, specifically the insufficient sample size for detecting a causal link given the rarity of disorder Y.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Inference-Bait20% picked this

    Researchers should conduct more-extensive studies of procedure X to determine whether the procedure is causally linked

    This answer suggests conducting further research, which is logical "what is something else the author might believe" kind of idea, but not explicitly stated in the argument, so not a contender for a Main Conclusion answer.

  4. Contradicted2% picked this

    The two studies cited did not reach a conclusion as to whether disorder Y results

    The studied did reach a conclusion. They concluded there is no causal link (in either direction). Plus, this isn't the statistician's conclusion. The conclusion is that the studies were unsound.

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Despite the opinions of many medical experts, it has not been established that there is a causal link between procedure

    This answer introduces the opinions of medical experts and attempts to establish a lack of causal link, which wasn't directly discussed.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free