Reading Comprehension

PT119 · S1 · P3 · Q18 Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers.

Topic

Why pronghorns run faster than any modern North American predator — the "relict behavior" hypothesis.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy / Problem-Solution. The author presents the puzzle, the relict-behavior hypothesis, the supporting evidence (including pronghorn herding), and similar relict behaviors in other animals.

Main Point

The pronghorn's extraordinary speed and other behaviors are best explained as adaptations to long-extinct predators — relict behaviors. The supporting evidence (pronghorn herding, mate selection, plus parallel cases in fish and ground squirrels) increases the plausibility of relict-behavior explanations.

P1: The puzzle and the proposed solution

Pronghorns can run 90 km/h, far faster than any modern North American predator. One biologist proposes that pronghorns adapted to predators known from the fossil record (American cheetahs, long-legged hyenas) that have been extinct for 10,000 years.

P2: Why biologists are wary of relict behaviors

Most biologists distrust relict-behavior explanations because they're hard to test (the principal component is extinct). They're typically considered only when alternatives fail. But present-day observations sometimes yield supporting evidence.

P3: Evidence for the pronghorn case

Several pronghorn behaviors look like adaptations to extinct enemies. Pronghorns herd, which gives more eyes to watch for predators and reduces the chance any one animal is attacked — but causes overcrowding and food competition. Since pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores, herding looks like a relict adaptation. Similarly, female pronghorns choose mates by speed and endurance, which would have been useful when fast predators existed.

18.

The last paragraph most strongly supports which one of the following statements?

  1. An absence of predators in

    Trap

    Too Strong / Unsupported Comparison: just as much This sort of violates common sense. How would an absence of predators be a threat to the well-being of an animal? All we heard is that if an absence of predators persists for long enough (like 3 million years), then a relict behavior might eventually disappear.

    5% picked this

  2. Relict behaviors are found in

    Too Strong: most

    We're told that relict behaviors "appear to occur in other animals". But that's nowhere near strong enough to justify the claim that more than 50% of wild animals living today have relict behaviors.

    3% picked this

  3. Correct

    If a behavior is an

    Why this is right

    This is supported by what we learn about ground squirrels. They adapted to the presence of rattlesnakes with certain anti-rattlesnake behavior. They have been free from snakes for 70-300 thousand years, but this relict behavior persists. If they happen to see a rattlesnake, they still react with that evolved rattlesnake behavior. But .. according to the last couple sentences, a subtype of ground squirrels that has been free of snakes for 3 million years does not exhibit the evolved rattlesnake behavior. So that anti-rattlesnake behavior is an adaptation to environmental conditions (rattlesnakes), but it may eventually disappear in the absence of snakes, as it has with the arctic ground squirrels.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    81% picked this

  4. Behavior patterns that originated as

    Too Strong: persist interminably

    This is sort of the inversion of (C). (C) is saying, "if defensive behavior patterns are NOT periodically reinforced (if the predator is absent for long enough), then that behavior may disappear". That is supported by what we learned about arctic ground squirrels. This is saying, "if defensive behavior patterns ARE periodically reinforced, they will last FOREVER." There's nothing in the paragraph to support a claim that strong.

    10% picked this

  5. Behavior patterns invariably take longer

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: invariably Unsupported Comparison: longer to develop We have no information about how long it takes for animals to initially develop these behaviors, so there's no way to compare how long it takes to develop vs. how long it takes to disappear. It's suggested by the last paragraph that it takes more than 300,000 years for one of these patterns to disappear. To pick this answer, we'd need to know that it always takes more than 300,000 years for these patterns to develop, but we don't have any information like that.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free