Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT119 S1 P3 Q17 Explanation

Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers. Because no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down, biologists have had difficulty explaining long-legged hyenas, either of which, it is believed, were fast enough to run down the pronghorn.

Like all explanations that posit what is called a relict behavior—a behavior that persists though its only evolutionary impetus comes from long-extinct environmental conditions—this one is likely to meet with skepticism. Most biologists distrust explanations positing relict behaviors, in part because testing these hypotheses is so difficult due to the extinction of do so. But present-day observations sometimes yield evidence that supports relict behavior hypotheses.

In the case of the pronghorn, researchers have identified much supporting evidence, as several aspects of pronghorn behavior appear to have been shaped by enemies that no longer exist. For example, pronghorns—like many other grazing animals—roam in herds, which allows more eyes to watch for predators and diminishes the chances of any pronghorns, for example, choosing the victor after male pronghorns challenge each other in sprints and chases.

Relict behaviors appear to occur in other animals as well, increasing the general plausibility of such a theory. For example, one study reports relict behavior in stickleback fish belonging to populations that have long been free of a dangerous predator, the sculpin. In the study, when presented with sculpin, these stickleback fish to recognize the threat of a rattlesnake, exhibiting only disorganized caution even after being bitten repeatedly.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Topic

The author is investigating a small mystery: why is the pronghorn (an antelope-like animal) so weirdly fast when nothing currently chases it?

Framework

Problem-Solution. The author presents the puzzle and walks through a proposed answer with its supporting evidence.

Main Point

The simpler version: pronghorns can run 90 km/h, but no current predator is anywhere close to that fast. Why? One theory says they're still running from predators that went extinct 10,000 years ago — basically, evolution hasn't caught up. Biologists are usually skeptical of "they're running from ghosts" explanations because they're hard to test, but in the pronghorn case the rest of the animal's behavior (herd grouping, mate preferences) lines up. Other animals show similar leftover behaviors too — fish that fear extinct fish predators, squirrels that recognize rattlesnakes despite no contact for thousands of years.

P1: The mystery

Pronghorns run way faster than anything currently chasing them. One biologist's theory: they're adapted to predators that went extinct 10,000 years ago — American cheetahs and long-legged hyenas.

P2: Why this kind of theory is hard to swallow

"Relict behavior" — a behavior left over from extinct conditions — is hard to test because the predator is gone. Biologists usually only accept it when nothing else works.

P3: The evidence stacks up

Pronghorns herd — useful for spotting and avoiding predators, but costly because of food competition. Why bother if no predator threatens? Looks like a leftover. Similarly, female pronghorns choose mates by speed, which would have mattered when fast predators existed.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Based on the passage, the term “principal component” (second paragraph) most clearly refers to which one

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal: relict behavior11% picked this

    behavior that persists even though the conditions that provided its evolutionary

    We're looking for "the super fast predator (such as a cheetah or hyena) that was in the pronghorn's environment long ago" This is describing the relict behavior, the speed that the pronghorn developed as a result of the super fast predator and continues to have today. We can remind ourselves that this "principal component" is extinct. The sentence says "... due to the extinction of the principal component". A relict behavior that persists is definitely not extinct.

  2. Pronghorn vs. Predator13% picked this

    the original organism whose descendants’ behavior is being investigated as

    We're looking for "the super fast predator (such as a cheetah or hyena) that was in the pronghorn's environment long ago" This is describing the ancestral pronghorn. Its descendants are the modern pronghorns, whose super-fast behavior is being investigated as a relict behavior. We can remind ourselves that this "principal component" is extinct. The sentence says "... due to the extinction of the principal component". An organism whose descendants are being investigated today is definitely not extinct.

  3. Unrelated to Goal: relict behavior0% picked this

    the pronghorn’s ability to run 90 kilometers per hour over

    We're looking for "the super fast predator (such as a cheetah or hyena) that was in the pronghorn's environment long ago" This is describing the relict behavior, the speed that the pronghorn developed as a result of the super fast predator and continues to have today. We can remind ourselves that this "principal component" is extinct. The sentence says "... due to the extinction of the principal component". The pronghorn's ability to run 90 km/hr is not extinct.

  4. Correct71% picked this

    the environmental conditions in response to which relict behaviors are thought

    Why this is right

    We're looking for "the super fast predator (such as a cheetah or hyena) that was in the pronghorn's environment long ago, i.e. the evolutionary impetus for the relict behavior. That's what this is describing. The environmental condition of "super fast predators such as cheetah/hyena" are now extinct. But when it was present, the pronghorn evolved super fast speed in response to it, and now it still has this speed as a relict behavior.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unrelated to Goal: living animal4% picked this

    an original behavior of an animal of which certain present-day behaviors are thought

    We're looking for "the super fast predator (such as a cheetah or hyena) that was in the pronghorn's environment long ago that made the pronghorn evolve to be faster". This isn't talking about the predator, who is now extinct. This is talking about an animal that has continued to exist. It has present-day behaviors that are different from its original behaviors.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free