Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT119 S1 P3 Q16 Explanation

Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers. Because no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down, biologists have had difficulty explaining long-legged hyenas, either of which, it is believed, were fast enough to run down the pronghorn.

Like all explanations that posit what is called a relict behavior—a behavior that persists though its only evolutionary impetus comes from long-extinct environmental conditions—this one is likely to meet with skepticism. Most biologists distrust explanations positing relict behaviors, in part because testing these hypotheses is so difficult due to the extinction of do so. But present-day observations sometimes yield evidence that supports relict behavior hypotheses.

In the case of the pronghorn, researchers have identified much supporting evidence, as several aspects of pronghorn behavior appear to have been shaped by enemies that no longer exist. For example, pronghorns—like many other grazing animals—roam in herds, which allows more eyes to watch for predators and diminishes the chances of any pronghorns, for example, choosing the victor after male pronghorns challenge each other in sprints and chases.

Relict behaviors appear to occur in other animals as well, increasing the general plausibility of such a theory. For example, one study reports relict behavior in stickleback fish belonging to populations that have long been free of a dangerous predator, the sculpin. In the study, when presented with sculpin, these stickleback fish to recognize the threat of a rattlesnake, exhibiting only disorganized caution even after being bitten repeatedly.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Topic

The author is investigating a small mystery: why is the pronghorn (an antelope-like animal) so weirdly fast when nothing currently chases it?

Framework

Problem-Solution. The author presents the puzzle and walks through a proposed answer with its supporting evidence.

Main Point

The simpler version: pronghorns can run 90 km/h, but no current predator is anywhere close to that fast. Why? One theory says they're still running from predators that went extinct 10,000 years ago — basically, evolution hasn't caught up. Biologists are usually skeptical of "they're running from ghosts" explanations because they're hard to test, but in the pronghorn case the rest of the animal's behavior (herd grouping, mate preferences) lines up. Other animals show similar leftover behaviors too — fish that fear extinct fish predators, squirrels that recognize rattlesnakes despite no contact for thousands of years.

P1: The mystery

Pronghorns run way faster than anything currently chasing them. One biologist's theory: they're adapted to predators that went extinct 10,000 years ago — American cheetahs and long-legged hyenas.

P2: Why this kind of theory is hard to swallow

"Relict behavior" — a behavior left over from extinct conditions — is hard to test because the predator is gone. Biologists usually only accept it when nothing else works.

P3: The evidence stacks up

Pronghorns herd — useful for spotting and avoiding predators, but costly because of food competition. Why bother if no predator threatens? Looks like a leftover. Similarly, female pronghorns choose mates by speed, which would have mattered when fast predators existed.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Correct74% picked this

    Evidence from present-day animal behaviors, together with the fossil record, supports the hypothesis that the pronghorn’s ability to far outrun any predator currently on

    Why this is right

    The main clause is, "Evidence supports the hypothesis that the pronghorn's ability to far outrun is an adaptation to predators long extinct". That's what we wanted. It matches the beginning of the 3rd paragraph, which was our Most Valuable Sentence. We have to then sign off on all the other details, but they all check out. Present-day animal behaviors: they roam in herds, which would make sense if there were a scary predator in their environment The fossil record: there used to be American cheetahs and long-legged hyenas in the pronghorn's environment, but they went extinct at least 10,000 years ago. Ability to far outrun any predator currently on the North American continent: "the pronghorn, which lives in North America, is the continent's fastest land animal ... no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down".

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Wrong Emphasis: squirrels4% picked this

    Although some biologists believe that certain animal characteristics, such as the speed of the pronghorn, are explained by environmental conditions that have not existed

    The main clause of this answer is "recent data concerning arctic ground squirrels make it doubtful that certain animal characteristics are explained by environmental conditions that haven't existed for many years". Big red flag if our main clause isn't mentioning the pronghorn, which was the central topic of the passage. Also, the data about squirrels did not call into question the theory of relict behaviors, it merely provides a nuance that shows that if relict behaviors exist, they are not necessarily permanent.

  3. Too Strong: most9% picked this

    Research into animal behavior, particularly into that of the pronghorn, provides strong evidence that most present-day characteristics of animals are explained by environmental conditions

    The main clause says "most present-day characteristics of animals are explained by environmental conditions that haven't existed for many years". Whoa ... where did the passage specify that more than 50% of animals' traits are relict behaviors? There is no quantifying anywhere in the passage of what proportion of an average animal's behavioral traits could be relict behaviors.

  4. Wrong Emphasis: squirrels5% picked this

    Even in those cases in which an animal species displays characteristics clearly explained by long-vanished environmental conditions, evidence concerning arctic ground squirrels suggests

    The main clause of this answer is "evidence concerning arctic ground squirrels suggests that those characteristics will eventually disappear". Big red flag if our main clause isn't mentioning the pronghorn, which was the central topic of the passage. The data about squirrels was not important. It just attached a nuance that shows that if relict behaviors exist, they are not necessarily permanent. It actually goes contra to the main point. It's a qualification. Trap answers love to overvalue whatever was said last in the passage.

  5. Too Strong8% picked this

    Although biologists are suspicious of hypotheses that are difficult to test, there is now widespread agreement among biologists that many types of animal characteristics

    Too Strong: widespread Wrong Emphasis: no pronghorn It's a big red flag that the central topic of the passage, pronghorns, is nowhere to be found in this answer. The main clause of this answer is "there is now widespread agreement among biologists that many types of animal characteristics are [relict behaviors]." We were never told that there is widespread agreement. There was "one biologist" in the first paragraph who has a relict behavior belief about the pronghorn. Our author seems to agree. And there are "researchers" in the final paragraph who have identified much supporting evidence about the pronghorn specifically. None of them are quoted saying "many types of animal characteristics are relict behaviors", and we couldn't add up all these people to get to "widespread agreement among biologists".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free