Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT119 S1 P3 Q19 Explanation

Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers. Because no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down, biologists have had difficulty explaining long-legged hyenas, either of which, it is believed, were fast enough to run down the pronghorn.

Like all explanations that posit what is called a relict behavior—a behavior that persists though its only evolutionary impetus comes from long-extinct environmental conditions—this one is likely to meet with skepticism. Most biologists distrust explanations positing relict behaviors, in part because testing these hypotheses is so difficult due to the extinction of do so. But present-day observations sometimes yield evidence that supports relict behavior hypotheses.

In the case of the pronghorn, researchers have identified much supporting evidence, as several aspects of pronghorn behavior appear to have been shaped by enemies that no longer exist. For example, pronghorns—like many other grazing animals—roam in herds, which allows more eyes to watch for predators and diminishes the chances of any pronghorns, for example, choosing the victor after male pronghorns challenge each other in sprints and chases.

Relict behaviors appear to occur in other animals as well, increasing the general plausibility of such a theory. For example, one study reports relict behavior in stickleback fish belonging to populations that have long been free of a dangerous predator, the sculpin. In the study, when presented with sculpin, these stickleback fish to recognize the threat of a rattlesnake, exhibiting only disorganized caution even after being bitten repeatedly.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Anticipate

This is a Locate Detail question. The passage names exactly two benefits of herding in P3: more eyes to spot predators, and reduced chance that any one animal gets attacked. The right answer will paraphrase one of those.

Goal

Look for an answer matching either of the two benefits the passage actually states. Common traps:

Plausible herding benefits that aren't in the passage — intimidation through density, protection of young, easier food/water search, safety in the center

If something sounds right but isn't in the passage, it's wrong

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following describes a benefit mentioned in the passage that grazing animals derive from

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope2% picked this

    The greater density of animals tends to intimidate

    The passage doesn't mention intimidation of predators by density. The herding benefits stated are detection (more eyes) and reduced individual attack chance — not deterrence through density.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    The larger number of adults in a herd makes protection of the younger animals from

    The passage doesn't mention protecting younger animals at all. The herding benefits given are about detection (more eyes) and individual risk reduction across the herd, not specifically about protecting young from predators.

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    With many animals searching it is easier for the herd to find

    The passage doesn't cite easier food or water search as a herding benefit — in fact it says the opposite: herding can cause "overcrowding and increased competition for food." So food-related advantages aren't supported.

  4. Correct94% picked this

    The likelihood that any given individual will be attacked by a

    Why this is right

    This matches one of the two benefits stated in P3 directly: herding "diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked." (D) paraphrases this as the likelihood of any given individual being attacked decreasing — exactly what the passage says.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope0% picked this

    The most defenseless animals can achieve greater safety by remaining in the center

    The passage doesn't discuss positioning within the herd — defenseless animals at the center, etc. The benefits given are general (more eyes, lower individual attack chance), not position-based.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free