Reading Comprehension

PT119 · S1 · P3 · Q19 Pronghorns

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several kilometers.

Topic

Why pronghorns run faster than any modern North American predator — the "relict behavior" hypothesis.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy / Problem-Solution. The author presents the puzzle, the relict-behavior hypothesis, the supporting evidence (including pronghorn herding), and similar relict behaviors in other animals.

Main Point

The pronghorn's extraordinary speed and other behaviors are best explained as adaptations to long-extinct predators — relict behaviors. The supporting evidence (pronghorn herding, mate selection, plus parallel cases in fish and ground squirrels) increases the plausibility of relict-behavior explanations.

P1: The puzzle and the proposed solution

Pronghorns can run 90 km/h, far faster than any modern North American predator. One biologist proposes that pronghorns adapted to predators known from the fossil record (American cheetahs, long-legged hyenas) that have been extinct for 10,000 years.

P2: Why biologists are wary of relict behaviors

Most biologists distrust relict-behavior explanations because they're hard to test (the principal component is extinct). They're typically considered only when alternatives fail. But present-day observations sometimes yield supporting evidence.

P3: Evidence for the pronghorn case

Several pronghorn behaviors look like adaptations to extinct enemies. Pronghorns herd, which gives more eyes to watch for predators and reduces the chance any one animal is attacked — but causes overcrowding and food competition. Since pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores, herding looks like a relict adaptation. Similarly, female pronghorns choose mates by speed and endurance, which would have been useful when fast predators existed.

19.

Which one of the following describes a benefit mentioned in the passage that grazing animals derive from roaming in herds?

  1. The greater density of animals

    Out of Scope

    The passage doesn't mention intimidation of predators by density. The herding benefits stated are better detection (more eyes) and reduced individual chance of individuals being attacked.

    2% picked this

  2. The larger number of adults

    Out of Scope

    The passage doesn't mention protecting younger animals at all. The herding benefits given are about detection (more eyes) and individual risk reduction across the herd, not specifically about protecting young from predators.

    1% picked this

  3. With many animals searching it

    Out of Scope

    The passage doesn't cite easier food or water search as a herding benefit. (in fact it says the opposite: herding can cause "overcrowding and increased competition for food.") This doesn't match either of the available answers: 1) "more eyes to watch for predators" or 2) "diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked."

    2% picked this

  4. Correct

    The likelihood that any given

    Why this is right

    This matches one of the two benefits stated in P3 directly: herding "diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked." (D) paraphrases this as the likelihood of any given individual being attacked decreasing.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    95% picked this

  5. The most defenseless animals can

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope (center of the herd) The passage doesn't discuss positioning within the herd, i.e. defenseless animals at the center. This is our available support text, which does not talk about weaker animals moving towards the center. 1) "more eyes to watch for predators" or 2) "diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked."

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free