Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT117 S1 P4 Q22 Explanation

The Modern Movement

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The proponents of the Modern Movement in architecture considered that, compared with the historical styles that it replaced, Modernist architecture more accurately reflected the functional spirit of twentieth-century technology and was better suited to the newest building methods. It is ironic, then, that the Movement fostered at odds with the way buildings were really built.

The tenacious adherence of Modernist architects and critics to this ideology was in part responsible for the Movement’s decline. Originating in the 1920s as a marginal, almost bohemian art movement, the Modern Movement was never very popular with the public, but this very lack of popular support produced in Modernist architects a drawn to only those features of their work that were “Modern”; other aspects were conveniently ignored.

The decline of the Modern Movement later in the twentieth century occurred partly as a result of Modernist architects’ ignorance of building methods, and partly because Modernist architects were reluctant to admit that their concerns were chiefly aesthetic. Moreover, the building industry was evolving in a direction Modernists had not anticipated: it could only be accomplished at considerable cost—hence the well-founded reputation of Modern architecture as prohibitively expensive.

As Postmodern architects recognized, the need to expose structural elements imposed unnecessary limitations on building design. The unwillingness of architects of the Modern Movement to abandon their ideals interest in the Modern Movement.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following is most similar to the relationship described in the passage between the new methods of the building

Answer choices

  1. Correct77% picked this

    Clothing produced on an assembly line is less precisely tailored than clothing produced by a

    Why this is right

    The contrast between assembly line and single garment maker seems to resonate pretty well with our sets of traits. assembly line single garment maker more specialized more general more fragmented more integrated many ppl doing fewer ppl doing specialized tasks lots of tasks This whole "less precisely tailored" part of the answer would mean that newer building methods result in "less precision in the details" than did the older methods? Yes, we can match that up as well, because the 3rd paragraph is talking about how Modern architects failed to realize that part of their aesthetic, exposed structural materials, required an "unrealistically high level of craftsmanship" (precise tailoring), given that buildings were now built according to newer methods that "reflected the allowable degree of inaccuracy of different trades" (imprecision).

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Match6% picked this

    Handwoven fabric is more beautiful than fabric produced

    "Hand-made" vs. "machine made" doesn't really match well to our cluster of descriptions. Hand-made? <----> Machine Made? more specialized more general more fragmented more integrated many ppl doing fewer ppl doing specialized tasks lots of tasks "Machine made" seems like it would be more specialized, because the machine might only do one thing, but then it also seems like it would be "fewer people doing tasks". The big distinctions in the old style vs. new style of construction were: small crew of workers doing lots of jobs vs. big crew of workers doing one specialized job Machine-made vs. hand-made seems to be a poor fit for that distinction. Also, the concept of saying that the older buildings were "more beautiful" is out of scope. The author doesn't ever say that the older styles of construction crew made more beautiful output than do the modern construction crews.

  3. Bad Match5% picked this

    Lenses ground on a machine are less useful than lenses ground

    This has the same "Hand-made" vs. "machine made" distinction that (B) had. Not only would these two pretty much cancel each other out, but as we decided with (B), it's hard to assign one of these things to "hand-made" and the other to "machine made": small crew of workers doing lots of jobs vs. big crew of workers doing one specialized job Also, the concept that the older constructions crews created "more useful" output than did modern crews is out of scope.

  4. Bad Match5% picked this

    Form letters produced by a word processor elicit fewer responses than letters typed individually

    Both options here are machine-made (word processor vs. typewriter). So the real distinction is a customized, one-of-a-kind output vs. a mass produced template-y output. Can we match up the distinction of "customized, unique" vs. "template / carbon copies" with the central distinction between older and newer crews? small crew of workers doing lots of jobs vs. big crew of workers doing one specialized job It's not a great match. The older construction crews typed individual letters on a typewriter? They did each one by hand, whereas the modern crews can use a template to mass produce something? That's not the distinction we're getting between "small and big" and "specialized tasks vs. generalized tasks". Also, it's not clear how we could match up elicit fewer responses with the construction crews. According to this answer, the modern crews "get fewer reactions from their intended audiences" than do the older crews. We can't support that anywhere in the passage.

  5. Bad Match7% picked this

    Furniture produced in a factory is less fashionable than

    This has the same "Hand-made" vs. "machine made" distinction that (B) and (C) had. Not only would these three pretty much cancel each other out, but as we decided with (B), it's hard to assign older crews / newer crews to the concepts of "hand-made" and "machine made". We weren't told that older crews worked by hand while newer crews worked by machine. We were just told that older crews were "small crew of workers doing lots of jobs" and modern crews were "big crew of workers each doing one specialized job". Also, the concept that the older constructions crews created "more fashionable" output than did modern crews is out of scope.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free