Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT116 S3 Q2 Explanation

The Fenwicks returned home from

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The Fenwicks returned home from a trip to find two broken bottles on their kitchen floor. There was no sign of forced entry and nothing in the house appeared to have been taken. Although the Fenwicks have a pet cat that had free run of the house while they were away, the it, attempted to raid the kitchen, and left after breaking the bottles.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Each of the following, if true, helps to support the Fenwicks’

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens8% picked this

    A neighbor thought he had seen the Fenwicks’ back door closing while the

    The neighbor saw the back door closing while the owners were away, which increases the plausibility that someone entered through that door, aligning with the hypothesis about the kids.

  2. Strengthens1% picked this

    When the Fenwicks returned home, they found children’s footprints on the back porch that had not been

    Footprints on the porch strengthen the hypothesis by suggesting that kids were at the location. This physical evidence increases the plausibility of the proposed scenario.

  3. Strengthens2% picked this

    The two bottles that the Fenwicks found broken on their kitchen floor had been in the refrigerator when

    This indicates that a cat could not remove bottles from the refrigerator, undermining the alternate explanation that cats knocked the bottles over.

  4. Strengthens2% picked this

    There have been several recent burglaries in the Fenwicks’ neighborhood in which neighborhood

    The fact that similar incidents have happened to other houses adds plausibility to the hypothesis that something like this could indeed happen with the kids involved.

  5. Correct87% picked this

    The Fenwicks returned home from their trip later than they

    Why this is right

    That the owners were gone longer than expected does not relate to whether the kids or another cause led to the bottles' breakage. It has no impact on the plausibility of the hypothesis or ruling out alternate causes.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free