Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S3 · P4 · Q25 Canadian Copyrights and Digitialization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

The following passage was written in the mid-1990s.

Topic

The challenges posed by Internet digitalization to Canadian copyright law in the 1990s

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The rise of digitalization via the Internet has created serious challenges for Canadian copyright law, which isn’t well equipped to handle digital copies and distribution, leading to ongoing conflicts between information-sharing ideals and content creators' rights. **The Most Valuable Sentence:** The last part of the last paragraph sums it up best:

P1: Introduction – The Information Utopia vs. Reality

Many Internet users dreamed of free access to information, but now those dreams are colliding with the reality that copyrighted books, films, and music are being distributed without compensation to rights holders, creating conflict.

P2: Legal Ambiguity – Copyright Law Lags Behind Technology

Canadian copyright law hasn’t kept up with digital advances, especially "digitalization"—which allows limitless, rapid copying and global distribution. Since current law only bans unauthorized "material reproduction," it's unclear if digital copies even count, so there’s a gray area about whether it's illegal.

P3: Proposed Solution and Its Complications

Some want to explicitly ban unauthorized digital copying, but criminalizing digitalization raises difficult questions: Should everyone who receives or makes a copy be a criminal? How would you enforce these laws with so many users worldwide? Also, academic exemptions further muddy the waters. Even with legal updates, experts doubt the underlying conflict—Internet users vs. publishers—can be resolved easily.

25.

Given the author's argument, which one of the following additions to current Canadian copyright law would most likely be an agreeable compromise to both the Internet community and the publishing community?

  1. Correct

    Digitalization of copyrighted works is

    Why this is right

    At first this may seem to favor the publishing community too much, because the Internet users want everything to be free. But because it's a small fee, we could consider it a compromise between "pay nothing - what do you think this is, a bookstore?" and "pay full price - this is basically like a bookstore!"

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    72% picked this

  2. Digitalization of copyrighted works is

    Goes Against Internet Community

    This would only represent the publishers' ownership interests. This doesn't feel like a compromise that offers anything to Internet users. If they're not in an academic context, they're simply banned from digitizing songs / books / images?

    4% picked this

  3. Digitalization of copyrighted works is

    Goes Against Publishing Community

    This would only represent the Internet community's interests. This doesn't feel like a compromise that offers anything to the publishing community. Everybody is just allowed unrestricted rights to digitize all copyrighted works. That's not a compromise. That's a "we got everything we wanted" victory for the internet community.

    1% picked this

  4. Digitalization of copyrighted works is

    Goes Against Internet Community

    This would only represent the publishers' ownership interests. This doesn't feel like a compromise that offers anything to Internet users. It's even harsher than (B), which was already too harsh.

    1% picked this

  5. Digitalization of copyrighted works is

    Goes Against Internet Community

    This does not appease the internet community, which wants digitized works to be treated as "information that is a raw material available for everyone to use". This answer sounds like the status quo. People engaged in private study or research are already granted copyright exemptions for non-digital stuff, and the author said "Even if the law is revised to contain a more sophisticated treatment of digitalization (meaning, it would have the same carve-outs for people engaged in study or research), most experts think it will be hard to resolve the clash". The author already seemed pessimistic that this sort of rule would resolve the clash. If this rule is implying that people not engaged in research aren't permitted to digitize copyrighted works, then it's way more restrictive than what the Internet community wants. If this rule allows people not engaged in research to also be permitted to digitize copyrighted works, then it's not restrictive enough for the publishing community.

    22% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free