Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT115 S3 P4 Q24 Explanation

Canadian Copyrights and Digitialization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The following passage was written in

Users of the Internet—the worldwide network of interconnected computer systems—envision it as a way for people to have free access to information via their personal computers. Most Internet communication consists of sending electronic mail or exchanging ideas on electronic bulletin boards; however, a growing number of transmissions are of copyrighted works—books, photographs, copyright holders look for ways to protect their material from unauthorized and uncompensated distribution.

Copyright experts say that Canadian copyright law, which was revised in 1987 to cover works such as choreography and photography, has not kept pace with technology—specifically with digitalization, the conversion of data into a series of digits that are transmitted as electronic signals over computer networks. Digitalization makes it possible to create clear whether digitalization constitutes a material reproduction—and so unauthorized digitalization is not yet technically a crime.

Some experts propose simply adding unauthorized digitalization to the list of activities proscribed under current law, to make it clear that copyright holders own electronic reproduction rights just as they own rights to other types of reproduction. But criminalizing digitalization raises a host of questions. For example, given that digitalization allows the the publishing community, which is accustomed to treating it as a commodity owned by its creator.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Trap7% picked this

    Despite the widely recognized need to revise Canadian copyright law to protect works from unauthorized reproduction and distribution over the Internet, users of the

    Wrong Focus Out of Scope: mounted legal challenges The main clause of this answer is that "users of the Internet have mounted many legal challenges". Was that the focus of this passage? Did we even enumerate any of them? Did we even mention them in passing? In all cases, no.

  2. Correct89% picked this

    Although the necessity of revising Canadian copyright law to protect works from unauthorized reproduction and distribution over the Internet is widely recognized, effective criminalizing

    Why this is right

    This describes the Problem and indicates that we don't yet have a satisfactory Solution.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Takeaway1% picked this

    While the unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works over the Internet is not yet a crime, legal experts believe it is only a

    The setup for this is fine, but the passage didn't indicate "it's only a matter of time". At the beginning of the 3rd paragraph, we just hear that some experts have proposed amending current law to include prohibitions on unauthorized digitalization. But then the author brings up several tricky issues with that proposal, so we have no reason to think that the proposal will come to fruition, it's just a matter of time.

  4. Too Strong1% picked this

    Despite the fact that current Canadian copyright law does not cover digitalization, the unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works over the Internet clearly

    Too Strong: ought to be a crime The author, in the last paragraph, in considering a blanket rule that digitalization be considered a crime. She has major qualms with this. - Would only the initial act be criminal? - Would each copy be a separate instance of piracy, even for people who had no access to the original? The author thinks this rule has some tricky application and that we'd probably need to be nuanced in terms of under what circumstances we want to call this a crime. This answer choice, meanwhile, is much more strongly worded and is happy to call it all a crime.

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Although legal experts in Canada disagree about the most effective way to punish the unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works over the Internet,

    Out of Scope: punish Too Strong: should clearly be a crime We can stop reading this before we hit the comma -- the passage never discussed what is the most effective way to punish unauthorized distributors? We also wouldn't agree to the second half of this answer, since the passage does not leave us with any clear consensus that experts all agree that we should clearly make all digitalization a punishable crime.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free