Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S3 · P4 · Q26 Canadian Copyrights and Digitialization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

The following passage was written in the mid-1990s.

Topic

The challenges posed by Internet digitalization to Canadian copyright law in the 1990s

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The rise of digitalization via the Internet has created serious challenges for Canadian copyright law, which isn’t well equipped to handle digital copies and distribution, leading to ongoing conflicts between information-sharing ideals and content creators' rights. **The Most Valuable Sentence:** The last part of the last paragraph sums it up best:

P1: Introduction – The Information Utopia vs. Reality

Many Internet users dreamed of free access to information, but now those dreams are colliding with the reality that copyrighted books, films, and music are being distributed without compensation to rights holders, creating conflict.

P2: Legal Ambiguity – Copyright Law Lags Behind Technology

Canadian copyright law hasn’t kept up with digital advances, especially "digitalization"—which allows limitless, rapid copying and global distribution. Since current law only bans unauthorized "material reproduction," it's unclear if digital copies even count, so there’s a gray area about whether it's illegal.

P3: Proposed Solution and Its Complications

Some want to explicitly ban unauthorized digital copying, but criminalizing digitalization raises difficult questions: Should everyone who receives or makes a copy be a criminal? How would you enforce these laws with so many users worldwide? Also, academic exemptions further muddy the waters. Even with legal updates, experts doubt the underlying conflict—Internet users vs. publishers—can be resolved easily.

26.

The discussion in the second paragraph is intended primarily to explain which one of the following?

  1. how copyright infringement of protected

    Out of Scope (punished)

    P2 doesn't talk at all about how offenders are punished. Jail time? Fines? We don't know.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    why current Canadian copyright law

    Why this is right

    Every sentence in P2 talks about current law, digitalization, or both, so this is pretty attractive. The final sentence of P2 is really where we explain why current law isn't easily applicable to digitalization: because digitalization just transforms the work into signals in a computer's memory, it's not clear whether it constitutes a material reproduction, which is what is officially prohibited by current law.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    90% picked this

  3. how the Internet has caused

    Trap

    Out of Scope (new forms of protection) There isn't any talk in P2 about new forms of legal protection. There is a sense that current copyright law doesn't take a clear stand on digitalization, but that doesn't necessarily mean that copyright holders want a new form of protection. They might just want the laws updated to specifically forbid digitalization. This answer would be more appropriate if it said that P2 explains "why current law leaves copyright holders seeking better legal protection".

    2% picked this

  4. why copyright experts propose protecting

    Trap

    Out of Scope (why it should be protected) P2 establishes that digitalization is not clearly forbidden by current law, so copyrighted works are not protected from unauthorized digitalization. But P2 never makes the experts' case for WHY it should be protected. Presumably, just a case would sound like, "The creators of these works deserve compensation for the value of these works, so allowing the works to be digitalized and distributed for free will deprive them of getting compensation. That might mean that it becomes impossible to make a living as a creator of copyrighted material, if you can't monetize it later (since everyone is just sharing it for free)." Nothing in P2 gets into why unauthorized digitalization could be unfair, injurious, or detrimental to the copyright holder.

    2% picked this

  5. how unauthorized reproductions of copyrighted

    Too Narrow

    There is a small mention that "digitalization turns a work into electronic signals in a computer's memory", and presumably that's part of how they get transmitted over the internet. But the bulk of the paragraph is about how current law relates to digitalization, not to the mechanics of how internet transmission works.

    4% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free