Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT115 S2 Q6 Explanation

Poor writers often express mundane

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Poor writers often express mundane ideas with elaborate syntax and esoteric vocabulary. Inattentive readers may be impressed but may well misunderstand the writing, while alert readers will easily see good principle for writers is: _______.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following completes the passage

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong (volume dial)18% picked this

    the simpler the style, the better

    Volume Dial phrasings like "the more x, the more y" are basically the strongest form of language, because they travel infinitely in both directions. According to this answer, "A rose is red" is better writing than "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet", because the former is simpler. This takes simplicity too far. The paragraph told us not to write in a complicated way just to hide that we have nothing interesting to say. But we can still be complicated if we're saying something interesting.

  2. Too Strong (not worth writing for)0% picked this

    inattentive readers are not worth writing

    This is a very extreme takeaway. We're just dismissing an entire segment of the reading audience? And why that segment? If we wanted to write in this pretentious fake-smart way they're describing, then we want inattentive readers, because they're the ones we can fool.

  3. Too Strong: only0% picked this

    only the most talented writers can successfully adopt a

    This might seem somewhat tempting. The paragraph was describing writers who were covering up for their mediocrity by writing in a complex style. But the paragraph wasn't talking about talented / not talented, in regards to using a complex writing style. The paragraph was talking about have something interesting to say / don't have something interesting to say, in regards to using a complex writing style. This answer is saying that if you're not in the uppermost echelon of most-talented writers, you can never successfully pull off a complex style. Too extreme.

  4. Correct81% picked this

    a writing style should not be more complex than the

    Why this is right

    This is the most moderately-worded answer available. It's not all or nothing. It's adjustable. If a good principle for writers is that we shouldn't let our style be more complex than our ideas, then we would avoid doing the pretentious fake-smart thing we were warned about in the paragraph. Mundane ideas are simple, in the sense that mundane means "commonplace, ordinary". While 'simple' isn't a perfect synonym for those words in many contexts, when it comes to ideas, someone who says mundane stuff isn't interesting or insightful. They're basic.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: the only1% picked this

    alert readers are the only readers who are sensitive to

    This extreme claim is not only too strong to be attractive, it's actually somewhat contradicted by the passage. Inattentive readers (not-alert) also seem to be sensitive to writing style. After all, they may be impressed by a fancy writing style.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free