Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S1 · P3 · Q16 Haraway’s Primate Visions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Donna Haraway’s Primate Visions is the most ambitious book on the history of science yet written from a feminist perspective, embracing not only the scientific construction of gender but also the interplay of race, class, and colonial and postcolonial culture with the “Western” construction of the very concept of nature itself.

Topic

Donna Haraway’s reimagining of the history of science, gender, and nature through primatology and feminist theory.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy + Challenge Position

Main Point

Haraway’s Primate Visions radically rethinks the history of science by rejecting traditional, unified narratives and challenging the separation between scientist and subject as well as between science and culture; instead, she argues for a fragmented, multiperspective view that includes cultural forces and nonhuman actors as shapers of knowledge. ()

P1: Introducing Haraway’s Book and its Ambition

Haraway’s Primate Visions is described as a bold, feminist history of science that doesn’t just look at gender, but also brings in race, class, and culture to show how Western views of nature have been shaped. Primatology is chosen as her entry point, since our closeness to primates invites scientists to project human societal beliefs onto them.

P2: Haraway’s Theoretical Challenge to Science

Haraway directly questions the usual idea that scientists are completely separate from the subjects they study. She says seeing nature as something apart from and controlled by people is outdated and problematic. Instead, she thinks both human and nonhuman agents (like primates themselves) help build what we know—and that instead of a single truth, we have many, interconnected partial truths.

P3: Haraway’s Unconventional Writing and Historical Approach

This different way of thinking is matched by her nonlinear, fragmented writing style. Rather than tying everything into one grand narrative about primatology, Haraway keeps separate voices distinct, refusing to force them into a "master story." This patchwork method is rare among historians of science.

16.

The passage suggests that Haraway would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about scientists observing animal behavior in the field?

  1. Those scientists who have been

    Too Strong: all

    This is a very strongly worded answer saying that "if you've been properly trained (whatever that means), then you'll always record similar observations". We have no way to support an idea this strong. If anything, the author probably disagrees with this. She might think that scientists are idiosyncratic and vary from person to person, because they're each projecting their own beliefs consciously and unconsciously onto their work.

    4% picked this

  2. Primatologists are more likely to

    Unknown Comparison

    Nothing in the passage gives us any ammunition for comparing primatologists to other animal behaviorists. The author never compliments primatologists for being especially good at recording accurate and sensitive observations.

    5% picked this

  3. Scientists studying primate behavior will

    Unknown Comparison

    This is comparing studying primates to studying other types of animals. The 1st paragraph stresses that "primates seem so much like ourselves that they provide ready material for scientists' conscious and unconscious projections of their beliefs about nature and culture". But that's the only part of the passage that seems to compare primates to non-primates, and nothing in that sentence is talking about us being more likely to record accurate and sensitive observations.

    15% picked this

  4. Correct

    Scientists who study primates will

    Why this is right

    This is comparing studying primates to studying other types of animals. The 1st paragraph stresses that "primates seem so much like ourselves that they provide ready material for scientists' conscious and unconscious projections of their beliefs about nature and culture". That sentence seems to provide some support for this answer. The 1st paragraph is saying that Haraway may have selected primatology as a vehicle for discussing how scientists are imparting their biases and worldview on their work, because "primatology is a particularly apt vehicle for such themes". In other words, scientists who study primates are particularly likely to reveal how they are projecting their own beliefs consciously and unconsciously on what they're studying.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    72% picked this

  5. Scientists who take a passive

    Unknown Comparison

    This is comparing passive interactions with active interactions, which is almost a distinction the passage brings up in the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph. But that sentence just says that traditionally scientists think of themselves as an active knower and think of the animals they're studying as passive objects. It has nothing to do with passively interacting with animals vs. actively interacting with animals.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free