Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT115 S1 P3 Q16 Explanation

Haraway’s Primate Visions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Donna Haraway’s Primate Visions is the most ambitious book on the history of science yet written from a feminist perspective, embracing not only the scientific construction of gender but also the interplay of race, class, and colonial and postcolonial culture with the “Western” construction of the very concept of nature itself. Primatology for scientists’ conscious and unconscious projections of their beliefs about nature and culture.

Haraway’s most radical departure is to challenge the traditional disjunction between the active knower (scientist/historian) and the passive object (nature/history). In Haraway’s view, the desire to understand nature, whether in order to tame it or to preserve it as a place of wild innocence, is based on a troublingly masculinist and colonialist agents cannot be reduced to a single, coherent reality—there are necessarily only multiple, interlinked, partial realities.

This iconoclastic view is reflected in Haraway’s unorthodox writing style. Haraway does not weave the many different elements of her work into one unified, overarching Story of Primatology; they remain distinct voices that will not succumb to a master narrative. This fragmented approach to historiography is familiar enough in historiographical theorizing but history, whether strictly narrative or narrative with emphasis on a causal argument.

Haraway is equally innovative in the way she incorporates broad cultural issues into her analysis. Despite decades of rhetoric from historians of science about the need to unite issues deemed “internal” to science (scientific theory and practice) and those considered “external” to it (social issues, structures, and beliefs), that dichotomy has proven one must shed a great many assumptions about what properly belongs to the study of science.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

The passage suggests that Haraway would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about scientists observing animal

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: all4% picked this

    Those scientists who have been properly trained in field techniques will all record similar observations about the

    This is a very strongly worded answer saying that "if you've been properly trained (whatever that means), then you'll always record similar observations". We have no way to support an idea this strong. If anything, the author probably disagrees with this. She might think that scientists are idiosyncratic and vary from person to person, because they're each projecting their own beliefs consciously and unconsciously onto their work.

  2. Unknown Comparison5% picked this

    Primatologists are more likely to record accurate and sensitive observations about the animals they are studying than

    Nothing in the passage gives us any ammunition for comparing primatologists to other animal behaviorists. The author never compliments primatologists for being especially good at recording accurate and sensitive observations.

  3. Unknown Comparison15% picked this

    Scientists studying primate behavior will probably record more accurate and sensitive observations than will scientists studying animals that

    This is comparing studying primates to studying other types of animals. The 1st paragraph stresses that "primates seem so much like ourselves that they provide ready material for scientists' conscious and unconscious projections of their beliefs about nature and culture". But that's the only part of the passage that seems to compare primates to non-primates, and nothing in that sentence is talking about us being more likely to record accurate and sensitive observations.

  4. Correct71% picked this

    Scientists who study primates will probably be more likely than will scientists studying other animals to interpret an animal’s behavior in terms

    Why this is right

    This is comparing studying primates to studying other types of animals. The 1st paragraph stresses that "primates seem so much like ourselves that they provide ready material for scientists' conscious and unconscious projections of their beliefs about nature and culture". That sentence seems to provide some support for this answer. The 1st paragraph is saying that Haraway may have selected primatology as a vehicle for discussing how scientists are imparting their biases and worldview on their work, because "primatology is a particularly apt vehicle for such themes". In other words, scientists who study primates are particularly likely to reveal how they are projecting their own beliefs consciously and unconsciously on what they're studying.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unknown Comparison5% picked this

    Scientists who take a passive role in interactions with the animals they study will probably record observations similar to those recorded by

    This is comparing passive interactions with active interactions, which is almost a distinction the passage brings up in the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph. But that sentence just says that traditionally scientists think of themselves as an active knower and think of the animals they're studying as passive objects. It has nothing to do with passively interacting with animals vs. actively interacting with animals.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free