Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S1 · P3 · Q15 Haraway’s Primate Visions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Donna Haraway’s Primate Visions is the most ambitious book on the history of science yet written from a feminist perspective, embracing not only the scientific construction of gender but also the interplay of race, class, and colonial and postcolonial culture with the “Western” construction of the very concept of nature itself.

Topic

Donna Haraway’s reimagining of the history of science, gender, and nature through primatology and feminist theory.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy + Challenge Position

Main Point

Haraway’s Primate Visions radically rethinks the history of science by rejecting traditional, unified narratives and challenging the separation between scientist and subject as well as between science and culture; instead, she argues for a fragmented, multiperspective view that includes cultural forces and nonhuman actors as shapers of knowledge. ()

P1: Introducing Haraway’s Book and its Ambition

Haraway’s Primate Visions is described as a bold, feminist history of science that doesn’t just look at gender, but also brings in race, class, and culture to show how Western views of nature have been shaped. Primatology is chosen as her entry point, since our closeness to primates invites scientists to project human societal beliefs onto them.

P2: Haraway’s Theoretical Challenge to Science

Haraway directly questions the usual idea that scientists are completely separate from the subjects they study. She says seeing nature as something apart from and controlled by people is outdated and problematic. Instead, she thinks both human and nonhuman agents (like primates themselves) help build what we know—and that instead of a single truth, we have many, interconnected partial truths.

P3: Haraway’s Unconventional Writing and Historical Approach

This different way of thinking is matched by her nonlinear, fragmented writing style. Rather than tying everything into one grand narrative about primatology, Haraway keeps separate voices distinct, refusing to force them into a "master story." This patchwork method is rare among historians of science.

15.

The passage suggests which one of the following about the traditional scientific approach to nature?

Scientists have traditionally preferred to
Irrelevant Distinction: taming > preserving
Both "taming nature and preserving it as a place of wild innocence" were characterizations of the traditional approach. This answer is making it seem like the traditional approach was one, not the other.
6% picked this
Scientists have traditionally sought to
Opposite
The 2nd paragraph is telling us that Haraway thinks the traditional way has been based on a troublingly masculinist and colonialist view of nature. This answer is saying that the traditional approach has been to counter that stuff.
3% picked this
Scientists have traditionally assumed that
Unsupported Comparison: more active
The 2nd paragraph isn't about 'primates' at all, so the fact that this answer is emphasizing primates should scare us off. This is taking a word that was used in an absolute sense (the scientist/historian is the active knower) and inventing some unsupported comparison by switching that familiar-sounding word into a Relative comparison ("primates are more active").
3% picked this
Scientists have traditionally endeavored to
Too Strong: endeavored to conceal
The fact that Haraway proposes (end of 2nd P) an approach that recognizes government officials and laborers certainly allows us to infer that the traditional approach did not recognize them as contributing to our knowledge. But it's way more accusatory and sinister than that to say that the traditional approach endeavored to conceal their role. The traditional approach might have just failed to appreciate their role, not gone out of their way to hide their role.
3% picked this
Correct
Scientists have traditionally regarded nature
Why this is right
This hews most closely to our Support Window. We're told that the traditional approach is a "disjunction between the active scientist knower and the passive natural object .... it's based on a view of nature as an entity distinct from us".
Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
85% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free