Logical Reasoning

PT114 · S2 · Q3 David: Forbidding companies from

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

David: Forbidding companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking employees would be profoundly unfair.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

3.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the exchange between David and Lin?

  1. David does not believe that

    Trap

    3% picked this

  2. David and Lin believe that

    Trap

    6% picked this

  3. Correct

    David and Lin disagree over

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

  4. David and Lin disagree over

    Trap

    8% picked this

  5. Lin believes it is unfair

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free