A favorable biography of a politician omits certain incriminating facts about the politician that were available to anyone when the book was written. The book’s author claims that, because he was unaware of these facts when he wrote the book, he is not accountable for the fact that readers were misled by kind cannot be used to evade blame for misleading readers.
What this question is testing
Your task
Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.
Common trap
Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.
Winning move
Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.