Reading Comprehension

PT112 · S2 · P2 · Q8 Latin Texts

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Binns asserts that the drama of Shakespeare, the verse of Marlowe, and the prose of Sidney—all of whom wrote in English—do not alone represent the high culture of Renaissance (roughly sixteenth-and seventeenth-century) England.

Topic

The overlooked importance of Latin-language works in understanding the intellectual culture of Renaissance England.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Binns argues that focusing only on English-language works and ignoring Latin works gives a distorted view of Renaissance England's intellectual culture, since many key achievements and influences are in Latin and not properly studied by either language experts or historians. (The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the start of paragraph 1 and is further summed up at the end of paragraph 3.)

P1: The Overlooked Role of Latin in Renaissance England

Binns points out that when we think of Renaissance England's high culture, we usually focus on famous works written in English, but actually, Latin was still hugely important. A lot of groundbreaking law, theology, and science was written in Latin, but these works are often ignored because modern academics tend to have narrow specializations and don’t overlap much.

P2: English-Focused Scholarship Misses the Real Picture

Historians who study the era mainly look at works written in or translated into English and tend to ignore how central Latin and Continental European influences were for English intellectuals. Even the writers we think of as super English were deeply immersed in Latin literature and the broader European intellectual culture.

P3: The Roots of the Problem and Its Consequences

It’s understandable—modern classicists aren’t trained in the technical Latin used in Renaissance science, and historians of English culture often can't read this kind of Latin. However, because each group only looks at half the picture, their understanding of England’s Renaissance culture ends up incomplete and distorted.

8.

The passage contains support for which one of the following statements concerning those scholars who analyze works written in Latin during the Renaissance?

  1. These scholars tend to lack

    Contradicted: lack training in language

    The author explains to us that the reason why so many important texts written in Latin go overlooked is because the people who know the difficult subject matter well (like science / medicine) usually aren't trained in reading Latin. Meanwhile, the people trained to read Latin (which is who this question stem is asking about) generally confine themselves to humanistic and literary writings. So these scholars do not tend to lack training in language.

    22% picked this

  2. Correct

    These scholars tend to lack

    Why this is right

    As we said with (A), the problem is that the scholars who know Latin really well don't understand science / math / biology well enough to deal with the important and neglected Latin texts. And the people who know science / math / biology well don't understand Latin well enough to read these Latin works. The sentence where we read about "the most learned students of Latin" says that these scholars generally stick to humanities and literary writings. "They leave ... the very works that revolutionized Western thought to specialists in those fields." The implication is that the people who are experts at Latin are too timid when it comes to tackling a work of science like that of Isaac Newton, because of the more alien and difficult "terminology, syntax, and content".

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    63% picked this

  3. Specialists in such literary forms

    Opposite

    The passage is suggesting that the people who know Latin really well (who possess the training in the Latin language) are the ones who study poems and orations. They're too intimidated by the difficult content to study the more "heavy" works of science / medicine / theology / law.

    7% picked this

  4. Language specialists have surveyed in

    Opposite

    The passage is suggesting that the people who know Latin really well (the language specialists) confine themselves to studying poems and orations. They're too intimidated by the difficult content to study the more "heavy" works of science / medicine / theology / law. So the passage certainly wouldn't say that they've studied the important works of law and medicine in too great detail. The passage thinks that they've failed to sufficiently study these important works: "Because many academic specializations do not overlap (i.e. because a Latin-expert is not also a legal expert or a medical expert), many texts have gone unexamined".

    2% picked this

  5. Scholars who analyze important Latin

    Contradicted: Latin works

    This answer is saying that the Latin-language specialists who study the Latin works of Marlowe / Shakespeare / Sidney don't know enough about the history of Latin to properly interpret early modern English culture. The first sentence says that Marlowe, Shakespeare, and Sidney wrote in English. We don't ever hear that they have any important Latin works.

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free