Reading Comprehension

PT112 · S2 · P2 · Q7 Latin Texts

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, J. W. Binns asserts that the drama of Shakespeare, the verse of Marlowe, and the prose of Sidney—all of whom wrote in English—do not alone represent the high culture of Renaissance (roughly sixteenth-and seventeenth-century) England.

Topic

The overlooked importance of Latin-language works in understanding the intellectual culture of Renaissance England.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Binns argues that focusing only on English-language works and ignoring Latin works gives a distorted view of Renaissance England's intellectual culture, since many key achievements and influences are in Latin and not properly studied by either language experts or historians. (The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the start of paragraph 1 and is further summed up at the end of paragraph 3.)

P1: The Overlooked Role of Latin in Renaissance England

Binns points out that when we think of Renaissance England's high culture, we usually focus on famous works written in English, but actually, Latin was still hugely important. A lot of groundbreaking law, theology, and science was written in Latin, but these works are often ignored because modern academics tend to have narrow specializations and don’t overlap much.

P2: English-Focused Scholarship Misses the Real Picture

Historians who study the era mainly look at works written in or translated into English and tend to ignore how central Latin and Continental European influences were for English intellectuals. Even the writers we think of as super English were deeply immersed in Latin literature and the broader European intellectual culture.

P3: The Roots of the Problem and Its Consequences

It’s understandable—modern classicists aren’t trained in the technical Latin used in Renaissance science, and historians of English culture often can't read this kind of Latin. However, because each group only looks at half the picture, their understanding of England’s Renaissance culture ends up incomplete and distorted.

7.

Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

  1. Analyses of the scientific, theological,

    Unsupported Comparison: more important

    The main point is not that, "Science / religion / law writings are more important than humanities and literary writings". The main point was more like, "Although we have a good grasp of humanities and literary writings composed in English or Latin, we have a really shaky grasp on the scientific / theological / legal stuff written in Latin, during the Renaissance."

    2% picked this

  2. The English works of such

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: their more challenging works The passage wasn't saying that we have a problem because while we have a good grasp of easier Shakespeare / Marlowe / Sidney stuff, we have a bad grasp of harder Shakespeare / Marlowe / Sidney stuff. The passage was saying that we have a problem because while we have a good grasp of Renaissance texts written in English (like Shakespeare / Marlowe / Sidney), we have a bad grasp of Renaissance texts written in Latin (like Newton, or any other important scientist / theologian / legal scholar who wrote in Latin).

    4% picked this

  3. Though traditionally recognized as the

    Wrong Emphasis: ancient Roman texts

    The main clause of this answer is, "Latin has until recently been studied primarily in connection with ancient Roman texts". That's miles away from the main point. We want something like, "There are a ton of really important texts from the Renaissance era that are written in Latin and thus get overlooked by most scholars."

    1% picked this

  4. Many Latin texts by English

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: all but ignored Too Strong: analyzed in depth The important texts, written in Latin, that Binns and the author are worried about are complicated works of science, theology, and law. They have not been analyzed in depth by literary critics and philologists: Even the most learned students of Renaissance Latin generally confine themselves to humanistic and literary writings in Latin. The lit critics and philologists will study poems and orations in depth, but they "leave works of theology and science, law and medicine, to 'specialists' in those fields", which are historians of science who lack philological training. Neither group is purposefully trying to ignore these Latin texts, but neither group is able to study them in depth. The people who know Latin really well can't understand those works of law / theology / science on a technical level. And the people who know law / theology / science on a technical level don't know Latin well enough to read them.

    6% picked this

  5. Correct

    Many Latin texts by English

    Why this is right

    The main clause here is, Many Latin texts by English Renaissance writers have been insufficiently understood. That is definitely the central gripe of Binns' book. We know well all the English-language stuff from the Renaissance, but "works of law, theology, and science written in Latin were among the highest achievements of the Renaissance". And "because many academic specializations do not overlap, many texts central to an interpretation of early modern English culture have gone unexamined". The author echoes this same causal explanation in the final paragraph: these limitations are understandable. The people who know Latin really well can't understand those works of law / theology / science on a technical level. And the people who know law / theology / science on a technical level don't know Latin well enough to read them.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    88% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free