Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT110 S4 P2 Q11 Explanation

Greek Tragic Dramas

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tragic dramas written in Greece during the fifth century B.C. engender considerable scholarly debate over the relative influence of individual autonomy and the power of the gods on the drama’s action. One early scholar, B. Snell, argues that Aeschylus, for example, develops in his tragedies a concept of the autonomy of the is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.”

To A. Rivier, Snell’s emphasis on the decision made by the protagonist, with its implicit notions of autonomy and responsibility, misrepresents the role of the superhuman forces at work, forces that give the dramas their truly tragic dimension. These forces are not only external to the protagonist; they are also experienced by not so much “choose” between two possibilities as “recognize” that there is only one real option.

A. Lesky, in his discussion of Aeschylus’ play Agamemnon, disputes both views. Agamemnon, ruler of Argos, must decide whether to brutally sacrifice his own daughter. A message from the deity Artemis has told him that only the sacrifice will bring a wind to blow his ships to an important battle. Agamemnon is Lesky’s view, tragic action is bound by the constant tension between a self and superhuman forces.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following summaries of the plot of a Greek tragedy best illustrates the view attributed to

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Point of View1% picked this

    Although she knows that she will be punished for violating the law of her city, a tragic figure bravely decides to bury her dead

    Wrong Point of View: nothing about gods Since Rivier's big theme is "the gods make the decision", we're not going to want to pick any answer like this that doesn't even bring up gods once.

  2. Weaker Match8% picked this

    Because of her love for her dead brother, a tragic figure, although aware that she will be punished for violating the law of her

    This one is pretty good. The protagonist does choose the action dictated by the gods. But when comparing it to the correct answer, this one loses on a couple levels. - gods' requesting something doesn't match as well with the 2nd paragraph's "a necessity imposed by the gods" - there's no mention of the tough deliberation process that precedes the human realizing their only choice is to obey the gods.

  3. Opposite: disobey gods1% picked this

    After much careful thought, a tragic figure decides to disobey the dictates of the gods and

    Rivier is all about "a necessity imposed by the gods" that the protagonist must blindly follow. This answer talks about disobeying the gods which would be the opposite. That would show that the protagonist, not the gods, is driving the action.

  4. Opposite: defying gods2% picked this

    A tragic figure, defying a curse placed on his family by the gods, leads his city into a battle that

    Rivier is all about "a necessity imposed by the gods" that the protagonist must blindly follow. This answer talks about defying a curse from the gods which would show that the protagonist, not the gods, is driving the action.

  5. Correct88% picked this

    After much careful thought, a tragic figure realizes that he has no alternative but to follow the course chosen by the

    Why this is right

    This hits both of the marks we were hoping for -- 1. human protagonist faces tough decision / deliberation / impasse? "after much careful thought ..." 2. Gods ultimately impose a necessity that drives the action? "he has no alternative but to follow the course chosen by the gods" The "no alternative" is a nice bonus ingredient, since it matches up nicely with the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free