Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT110 S4 P2 Q12 Explanation

Greek Tragic Dramas

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tragic dramas written in Greece during the fifth century B.C. engender considerable scholarly debate over the relative influence of individual autonomy and the power of the gods on the drama’s action. One early scholar, B. Snell, argues that Aeschylus, for example, develops in his tragedies a concept of the autonomy of the is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.”

To A. Rivier, Snell’s emphasis on the decision made by the protagonist, with its implicit notions of autonomy and responsibility, misrepresents the role of the superhuman forces at work, forces that give the dramas their truly tragic dimension. These forces are not only external to the protagonist; they are also experienced by not so much “choose” between two possibilities as “recognize” that there is only one real option.

A. Lesky, in his discussion of Aeschylus’ play Agamemnon, disputes both views. Agamemnon, ruler of Argos, must decide whether to brutally sacrifice his own daughter. A message from the deity Artemis has told him that only the sacrifice will bring a wind to blow his ships to an important battle. Agamemnon is Lesky’s view, tragic action is bound by the constant tension between a self and superhuman forces.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

The quotation at the end of the first paragraph suggests that Barbu assumes which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Causal Relationship: initiate15% picked this

    Aeschylean drama helped to initiate a new understanding of the person in

    Barbu didn't need to assume that Aeschylean drama caused this new understanding. He's perfectly happy (and maybe even happier) to assume that Aeschylean drama reflects this new understanding. i.e. He might be thinking that this new sense of self as a free agent emerged within Greek civilization, and then it started showing up in Aeschylean drama.

  2. Unsupported Causal Relationship: introduced27% picked this

    Aeschylean drama introduced new ways of understanding the role of the individual in

    Just like (A), we can't say that Barbu needs to assume that Aeschylean drama caused anything. It might just be reflecting society (i.e. caused by society).

  3. Too Strong: original / most0% picked this

    Aeschylean drama is the original source of the understanding of human motivation most familiar to

    This is way stronger than anything Barbu needs to assume. Even if this source of understanding about human motivation was the 2nd most familiar to the Western World, it would change nothing about Barbu's conclusion.

  4. Correct55% picked this

    Aeschylean drama accurately reflects the way personal autonomy was perceived in

    Why this is right

    This is saying that Barbu is assuming a correspondence between the theme of personal autonomy in Aeschylean drama with how personal autonomy was perceived in ancient Greek civilization. If we negate this, it definitely weakens: Aeschylean drama does not accurately reflect the way autonomy was perceived in ancient Greek society. Barbu was essentially making this type of argument: "Everyone in Aeschylean dramas loves mangos. Thus, ancient Greek civilization must have been really into mangos." He's assuming that what we're seeing in the plays mirrors what's going on more broadly in society. But what if the dramatists just have a some peculiar penchant for mangos that wasn't shared by the broader Greek society? Similarly, what if these Aeschylean dramas had a peculiar take on free will / personal autonomy that wasn't shared by the broader Greek society?

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Strong: most familiar2% picked this

    Aeschylean drama embodies the notion of freedom most familiar to the

    Just like (C), this answer contains extreme wording that Barbu doesn't need to be assuming. Would it hurt his claim about ancient Greek civilization of Aeschylean drama embodied only the 2nd most familiar notion of freedom to the modern Western world? Of course not. Barbu doesn't care where Aeschylean's notion of freedom ranks on the familiarity scale.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free