Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT110 S4 P2 Q10 Explanation

Greek Tragic Dramas

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Tragic dramas written in Greece during the fifth century B.C. engender considerable scholarly debate over the relative influence of individual autonomy and the power of the gods on the drama’s action. One early scholar, B. Snell, argues that Aeschylus, for example, develops in his tragedies a concept of the autonomy of the is proof of the emergence within ancient Greek civilization of the individual as a free agent.”

To A. Rivier, Snell’s emphasis on the decision made by the protagonist, with its implicit notions of autonomy and responsibility, misrepresents the role of the superhuman forces at work, forces that give the dramas their truly tragic dimension. These forces are not only external to the protagonist; they are also experienced by not so much “choose” between two possibilities as “recognize” that there is only one real option.

A. Lesky, in his discussion of Aeschylus’ play Agamemnon, disputes both views. Agamemnon, ruler of Argos, must decide whether to brutally sacrifice his own daughter. A message from the deity Artemis has told him that only the sacrifice will bring a wind to blow his ships to an important battle. Agamemnon is Lesky’s view, tragic action is bound by the constant tension between a self and superhuman forces.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

It can be inferred from the passage that the central difference between the interpretations of Lesky and Rivier is over which one

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal2% picked this

    whether or not the tragic protagonist is aware of the consequences of his

    We're looking for whether or not the protagonist chooses their action or has an action imposed upon them by the gods. This is talking about "the consequences of the actions".

  2. Unrelated to Goal15% picked this

    whether or not the tragic protagonist acknowledges the role of the deities in his

    We're looking for whether or not the protagonist chooses their action or has an action imposed upon them by the gods. This is talking about whether the protagonist "acknowledges the role the deities play in their lives". Both Lesky and Rivier think that the influence of the gods is heavily tied up in the dilemma the protagonist is wrestling with, so they'd agree that the protagonist is aware that the deities are playing a role in creating this dilemma.

  3. Correct75% picked this

    whether or not the tragic protagonist’s own desires have relevance to the outcome

    Why this is right

    We're looking for whether or not the protagonist chooses their action or has an action imposed upon them by the gods. This, in a weird way, expresses that distinction. Choosing an action implies that you desire to make that choice. If a choice is imposed on you, then your desires are irrelevant (they may or may not accord with the imposed choice; doesn't matter). Lesky thinks that the protagonist's desires have relevance to the outcome. Agamemnon chooses to sacrifice his daughter because he desires what the gods will give him in return. To Rivier, the gods impose a necessary choice and the protagonist tragically must take it, whether they want to or not.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Both Agree7% picked this

    whether or not the actions of the deities are relevant to the moral evaluation of

    Rivier never really talks about how we morally evaluate the character's action, but Lesky does (Agamemnon chooses a path -- chosen by the gods for their own reasons -- on the basis of desires that must be condemned by us, because they are his own). Still, this answer is somewhat tempting, because it almost seems to be a stand-in for the crucial issue here of, "Does the protagonist choose the action or do the deities impose a choice on the protagonist?" Our common sense notion of "moral evaluation" includes the idea that you had a choice in what you were doing. If someone were forced by another entity to do X, we usually wouldn't hold that person morally accountable for X. But whether we're talking Lesky or Rivier, they would both agree that the actions of the deities are relevant. They would disagree in terms of how the deities' actions are irrelevant. Lesky would think that the deities actions are relevant insofar as they present one of the constraints that protagonist struggles with. Rivier (we might speculate) would think that the deities actions are relevant to our moral evaluation because we could "let the protagonist morally off the hook for doing something bad that was imposed by the deities".

  5. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    whether or not the desires of the tragic protagonist are more ethical than those

    We're looking for whether or not the protagonist chooses their action or has an action imposed upon them by the gods. This is comparing how ethical the protagonists' desires are to how ethical the deities' desires are. Neither scholar gets into that.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free