Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT110 S2 Q14 Explanation

Some people claim that every

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some people claim that every human discovery or invention is an instance of self-expression. But what they seem to ignore is that, trivially, anything we do is self-expressive. So, until they can give us a more are not obliged to take their claim seriously.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for

Answer choices

  1. Weaker Impact11% picked this

    All claims that are trivial are

    While linking trivial claims to being uninteresting, this doesn't help us understand why these claims should not be taken seriously or considered. We'd have to add our own assumption that "if it's uninteresting, then it should be taken seriously or considered", making this a weaker answer than the correct answer.

  2. No Impact9% picked this

    Most people do not take trivial

    The conclusion, using normative wording like "obligated to", is about whether we should / shouldn't take a certain claim seriously, not about whether we are / aren't taking it seriously. This tells us that most people ARE NOT taking these claims seriously, but the argument is about whether people SHOULD NOT take these claims seriously.

  3. Correct69% picked this

    No claims that are trivial are worthy of

    Why this is right

    This option directly supports the argument by stating that trivial claims, like the self-expression claim, do not merit serious attention. It strengthens the claim that we're not obliged to take the self-expression interpretation seriously because of its trivial nature.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Opposite (if anything)8% picked this

    Every claim is open to both interesting and

    This doesn't connect the trivial nature of a claim with any reasoning that supports dismissing it. It instead suggests that even trivial claims can have interesting interpretations, which doesn't align with the author's argument.

  5. Weaker Impact3% picked this

    Every interpretation is either trivial or

    This option implies that interpretations can't be both trivial and interesting (like choice A), but doesn't have as direct a connection to the idea that "we're not obliged to take it seriously" as the correct answer does.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free