Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT110 S1 P4 Q23 Explanation

Women Refugees

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

When women are persecuted on account of their gender, they are likely to be eligible for asylum. Persecution is the linchpin of the definition of a refugee set out in the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. In this document, a refugee is defined as any person facing persecution such as women facing gender-based persecution, who are otherwise not covered by the definition’s specific categories.

The original definition of refugee, which came from the constitution of the International Refugee Organization, did not include social group. However, the above-mentioned United Nations Convention added the category in order to provide a “safety net” for asylum-seekers who should qualify for refugee status but who fail to fall neatly into one ensure that the category would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations.

A broad interpretation of social group is supported by the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (1979) published by the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The Handbook describes a social group as persons of similar background, habits, or social status. This expansive interpretation of treatment due to their having transgressed the social mores of the society in which they live.”

Such a pronouncement is particularly significant. A position taken by an organization such as the UNHCR is likely to exert a strong influence on the international community. In particular, the UNHCR’s position is likely to have an impact on the interpretation of national asylum laws, since the have been developed under the international consensus that UNHCR represents.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The author of the passage would most likely agree with which one of the following statements about the definition of a refugee in the constitution

Answer choices

  1. Correct70% picked this

    It failed to include some asylum-seekers who should have been considered eligible

    Why this is right

    This is a way to rephrase the idea that "it didn't include the social-group category". We know that this original definition wouldn't have had a category for dealing with asylum-seekers who were being persecuted based on gender. Are we comfortable with the implication that the author thinks that women being persecuted because of their gender should be considered eligible for refugee status? Sure, the 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph is saying that they added the social group category to provide a "safety net for asylum-seekers who should qualify for refugee status but who fail to fall neatly into on of the enumerated categories (in the IRO's definition of refugees)."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite5% picked this

    It provided a strong basis to support the claim that women seeking asylum from gender-based persecution should

    It provided no basis for women seeking asylum from gender-based persecution, because it didn't have the social-group category that is used for such women.

  3. Opposite22% picked this

    It reflected an awareness that some groups of refugees seeking asylum do not easily fall

    It seemed oblivious to the fact that it women who needed asylum for the sake of gender-based persecution do not easily fall into any of the specific categories enumerated.

  4. Opposite2% picked this

    It established that a person’s social-group membership may be as significant a cause of persecution as a person’s

    It failed to establish that social-group membership could also be a reason for being persecuted and thus a reason to be classified as a refugee and granted asylum.

  5. Out of Scope: prevented refusals1% picked this

    It prevented individual nations from refusing asylum to persons who were clearly eligible for such status on the

    Literally all we know about this definition is that it didn't include "social group". We couldn't possibly stretch that fact into supporting this claim that the IRO's definition prevented individual nations from refusing asylum to people who were eligible under that definition. How would a definition itself have any enforcement powers over countries refusing to abide by this definition?

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free