Reading Comprehension

PT110 · S1 · P4 · Q22 Women Refugees

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

When women are persecuted on account of their gender, they are likely to be eligible for asylum.

Topic

Eligibility of women facing gender-based persecution for refugee status under international law.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Women persecuted for their gender can qualify for asylum as part of the "social group" category in the UN's refugee definition, and this broad, flexible category was intentionally created to ensure such individuals are protected. The Most Valuable Sentence:—the end of paragraph 1:

P1: Establishing the Central Question and Position

Sets up the issue: gender is not explicitly listed in the refugee definition, but women suffering gender-based persecution do qualify under “social group.” The history of the definition shows that “social group” was designed as a catch-all for those otherwise left out.

P2: Historical Background on the “Social Group” Category

Explains where the "social group" category came from. The original refugee definition didn’t include it—the United Nations later added it as a flexible category to cover cases not neatly fitting the more specific criteria.

P3: Supporting the Broad Interpretation of Social Group

The UN’s Handbook and subsequent documents promote a broad, inclusive understanding of “social group.” This supports the idea that women fleeing gender-based persecution should qualify for asylum, especially since UN documents specifically encourage using this category for women in such situations.

22.

The author describes the definition of social group in the UNHCR Handbook as

  1. specific but flexible

    Contradicted: Specific

    We're told that the drafters "intentionally left the precise boundaries of social-group undefined", so it's hard to justify specific here.

    12% picked this

  2. obscure but substantive

    Unsupported: substantive

    The definition is pretty thin, not substantive. It's basically a carve out that's left deliberately unspecific so that it "would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations".

    1% picked this

  3. exhaustive and impartial

    Unsupported: exhaustive

    The definition is basically a carve out that's left deliberately unspecific so that it "would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations". It does not attempt to exhaustively list out all the types of situations that would qualify as social group.

    1% picked this

  4. Correct

    general and adaptable

    Why this is right

    The definition is general: "persons of similar background, habits, or social status". And it's meant to be that way so that it can be adapted to novel situations, so that it "would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations".

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

  5. comprehensive and exemplary

    Unsupported: comprehensive

    The definition was left deliberately unspecific so that it "would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations". It does not attempt to write a comprehensive / exhaustive list of all the types of situations that would qualify as social group.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free