Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT110 S1 P4 Q24 Explanation

Women Refugees

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

When women are persecuted on account of their gender, they are likely to be eligible for asylum. Persecution is the linchpin of the definition of a refugee set out in the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. In this document, a refugee is defined as any person facing persecution such as women facing gender-based persecution, who are otherwise not covered by the definition’s specific categories.

The original definition of refugee, which came from the constitution of the International Refugee Organization, did not include social group. However, the above-mentioned United Nations Convention added the category in order to provide a “safety net” for asylum-seekers who should qualify for refugee status but who fail to fall neatly into one ensure that the category would retain the flexibility necessary to address unanticipated situations.

A broad interpretation of social group is supported by the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (1979) published by the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The Handbook describes a social group as persons of similar background, habits, or social status. This expansive interpretation of treatment due to their having transgressed the social mores of the society in which they live.”

Such a pronouncement is particularly significant. A position taken by an organization such as the UNHCR is likely to exert a strong influence on the international community. In particular, the UNHCR’s position is likely to have an impact on the interpretation of national asylum laws, since the have been developed under the international consensus that UNHCR represents.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Your task

Identify why the author included the referenced detail at that point in the passage — its function, not its content.

Common trap

Answers that merely repeat or summarize the topic of the detail instead of describing the role it plays.

Winning move

Ask what job the detail does for the paragraph, then for the passage's broader point.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

The author describes persecution as the “linchpin of the definition of a refugee” (first paragraph) in order

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong5% picked this

    international acceptance of the definition was dependent on reaching consensus about

    Too Strong: dependent Out of Scope: consensus We don't have any support for this story in which countries of the world needed to settle on a definition for persecution before there was international acceptance of the definition of refugee.

  2. Too Strong: primary Unsupported Causal Relationship2% picked this

    international concern about the number of people fleeing persecution was the primary force behind the

    Nothing in that first paragraph supports this causal claim that nations of the world saw the number of people fleeing persecution and thought, "We have just go to create a definition for the term refugee."

  3. Out of Scope: agreement3% picked this

    persecution is a controversial term and it was difficult to reach international agreement about

    Just like (A), we'd give this the boot for making up a storyline where nations of the world debated the meaning of the term "persecution" and did / didn't come away with some consensus agreement on its meaning. Nothing in the passage describes such a debate.

  4. Too Strong: primary Unsupported Causal Relationship11% picked this

    persecution is the primary reason why people are forced to leave their home countries and

    Nothing in that first paragraph supports this causal claim that the #1 reason people seek asylum is because of persecution. Just because persecution is the only reason for asylum discussed in the first paragraph doesn't give us license to treat it as the only reason or #1 reason that people seek asylum. Perhaps abysmal economic conditions in their home country is the #1 reason people seek asylum, perhaps environmental catastrophes and natural disasters are the #1 reason.

  5. Correct78% picked this

    persecution is the central factor in determining whether a person is eligible

    Why this is right

    This answer stays locked in to the available Support Window. All we're told in the beginning of the first paragraph is that the definition of refugee says, "any person facing persecution, for reasons 1 through 10". That definitely looks like the central factor in the definition. It's the common denominator / the starting point.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free