Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT109 S4 Q14 Explanation

When soil is plowed in the spring,

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

When soil is plowed in the spring, pigweed seeds that have been buried in the soil all winter are churned up to the surface and redeposited just under the surface. The brief exposure of the seeds to sunlight stimulates receptors, which have become highly sensitive to sunlight during the months the seeds prolonged darkness, followed by exposure to sunlight, the seeds do not germinate.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following statements about a field that will be plowed in the spring and in which pigweed

Answer choices

  1. Correct64% picked this

    Fewer pigweed plants will grow in the field if it is plowed only at night than if it

    Why this is right

    This answer plays off the Causal Difference-Maker said in the final sentence: if the seeds don't have that special recipe of Prolonged Darkness followed by Sunlight Exposure, they don't germinate. So plowing during the day would expose those seeds to sunlight, sparking their germination. Plowing during the night would churn up all those seeds, but they wouldn't get any exposure to sunlight, so their receptors wouldn't trigger germination. Since a plant needs to germinate in order to grow (they're counting on us to have this common knowledge), you'd get more plants if you plow during the day than if you plow at night.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite3% picked this

    Fewer pigweed plants will grow in the field if it is plowed at all than if it is

    The syntax of this one is not agreeing with me. I just don't understand how that's grammatically or logically acceptable. It sounds like it's comparing a situation in which we plow "at least once, day or night" to a situation in which we plow "at night, if ever". We know from our thinking through (A) that if this field is plowed at night, the seeds won't be exposed to sunlight, so the receptors won't trigger germination, and no pigweed will grow. So since we know that none of them will grow if plowed only at night, then it's impossible for any situation to have fewer pigweed plants than zero.

  3. Unknown Comparison7% picked this

    Fewer pigweed plants will grow in the field if it is plowed just before sunrise than if it

    Which has more sunlight: the pinkish aurora before sunrise, or the pinkish hues around dusk? Naturally, we don't know and they're probably pretty similar, since they're opposite functions of each other. So we can't say that just before sunrise is dimmer than just after sunset, and the only way to justify fewer/greater pigweed plants is to establish less/more exposure to direct sunlight.

  4. Too Strong: unless24% picked this

    The pigweed seeds that are churned up to the surface of the soil during the plowing will not geminate unless they are redeposited

    We only have one rule provided that allows us to say "therefore, won't germinate", and that's the idea that "they weren't in prolonged darkness followed by exposure to sunlight". We were told that the seeds are redeposited beneath the surface, not that they need to be redeposited.

  5. Contradicted2% picked this

    All of the pigweed seeds that are already on the surface of the soil before the field

    The seeds that are already on the surface haven't had the required prolonged darkness that the seeds that were buried all winter had. Without the "long darkness + sunlight exposure" cocktail, the seeds don't germinate.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free