Politician: The bill that makes using car phones while driving illegal should be adopted.
Conclusion
The bill to say "using car phone while driving is illegal" should be adopted. (i.e. it should be illegal to use your car phone while driving)
Evidence
Using a car phone distracts the driver, which poses a threat to safe driving.
Meanwhile, if it were illegal to use your car phone while driving, people would be deterred from doing it.
Evaluate
On Sufficient Assumption, if there are any New Terms in the conclusion, they need to be in the correct answer. The big one in this conclusion is should be adopted.
We need to a construct a rule that sounds like
if ..... then .... the stuff we described in should adopt the evidence about this bill the bill
So what do we know about this bill?
It would make using your car phone while driving illegal. That would deter people from using their car phone while driving. Using your car phone seriously distracts the driver, which poses a threat to safe driving.
Chunking that all together, this bill would .
That seems to be the most common sense understanding of the author's rationale for why we should adopt the bill.
Goal
So we just need to hear something like
.