Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT109 S4 Q11 Explanation

Even though apes are the only nonhuman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Even though apes are the only nonhuman creatures able to learn human language, no ape has ever used its human language skills to ask such philosophical questions as, “How am I philosophical thought is unique to humans.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

The conclusion in the passage above relies on which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted2% picked this

    Human language is unique to

    The passage itself states that apes can learn human language, so the uniqueness of human language isn’t assumed or necessary for the argument.

  2. Too Strong: incapable11% picked this

    Apes are incapable of thinking in

    The argument isn’t about whether apes have the capacity to think in human language, just whether they have philosophical thoughts. Negating this answer doesn't weaken the argument, because even if apes could think in human language, they might still not ask philosophical questions.

  3. Correct82% picked this

    Philosophical thought can be expressed only in

    Why this is right

    This feels very strong, but the argument is making a certain move from "since apes haven't expressed philosophical questions in human language, they do not have philosophical thought". If we negate this, and philosophical thought could be expressed without human language, then apes might still have philosophical thought despite never asking such questions in human language. This creates doubt, which weakens the argument.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Irrelevant Comparison4% picked this

    Speaking in human language is easier than thinking in

    Whether speaking is easier than thinking has no bearing on whether the lack of philosophical questions in apes indicates an absence of philosophical thought.

  5. Irrelevant Causality / Opposite (if anything)1% picked this

    It is more difficult to learn human language than to express

    The comparative ease of learning language vs. expressing philosophical questions doesn't matter. We're only here to adjudicate whether apes are / aren't capable of philosophical thought. Plus, the author seems to think that apes CAN learn human language but CAN'T express philosophical questions, so if anything it seems like learning human language is the easier thing.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free