Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT109 S1 Q11 Explanation

Researchers have discovered that caffeine

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Researchers have discovered that caffeine can be as physically addictive as other psychoactive substances. Some people find that they become unusually depressed, drowsy, or even irritable if they do not have their customary dose of caffeine. This is significant because any one of the other addictive psychoactive substances.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following can be logically concluded from the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: #1 for addictions9% picked this

    There is no psychoactive substance to which more people are physically addicted than are

    It says that caffeine can be as addictive, and it says that caffeine is tied for #1 or alone at #1 when it comes to number of people who consume it. But we don't have any info about the number of people addicted to caffeine, so we can't compare # of caffeine addicts to # of any other kind of addict.

  2. Too Strong: typically11% picked this

    A physical addiction to a particular psychoactive substance will typically give rise to

    We only know that caffeine, which is a psychoactive substance, sometimes give rise to diverse psychological withdrawal symptoms. This passage doesn't let us generalize that most addictions to psychoactive substances give rise to diverse psychological symptoms.

  3. Out of Scope: non-psychoactive20% picked this

    Not all substances to which people can become physically addicted

    Not all A's are B = Some A's are not-B, so this answer choice says, "at least one substance to which people can become physically addicted is not psychoactive". It would probably be tempting for people to say: "Right. Caffeine!" But caffeine is identified (twice) as a psychoactive substance, because it says "caffeine can be as addictive as any other psychoactive substance" in the first sentence and uses that same "any other" formulation in the last sentence too. When you say "X is just as funny as any other clown", you're implying that X is a clown.

  4. Too Strong: conditional8% picked this

    If one is physically addicted to a psychoactive substance, one will become unusually depressed when one is no

    We only know that some people have "unusual depression" as a withdrawal symptom from caffeine. We can't take that fact and support a conditional rule that "if addicted to any psychoactive substance, then unusually depressed will be one your withdrawal symptoms."

  5. Correct52% picked this

    If alcohol is a physically addictive psychoactive substance, there are not more people who consume

    Why this is right

    We know that "at least as many people consume caffeine as consume any other psychoactive substance". So if Rice Krispies is a psychoactive substance, then at least as many people consume caffeine as consume Rice Krispies. Because of that last sentence, we know that if alcohol is a psychoactive substance, then at least as many people consume caffeine as alcohol. If at least as many consume caffeine, then it's fair to say there are not more who consume alcohol.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free