Reading Comprehension

PT108 · S4 · P3 · Q18 Hammer and Hoe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Robin D. G. Kelley's book Hammer and Hoe explores the history of communism in the U.S. state of Alabama.

Topic

The appeal and evolution of communism among African-American workers in Alabama, as explored in Robin D. G. Kelley’s Hammer and Hoe.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy; Present Debate

Main Point

Kelley’s book argues that the success and decline of communism among African-American workers should be measured by its practical impact and cultural resonance, not just its ideology or alliances, and shows that broader historical forces, not just shifts in Communist Party policy, shaped African-American involvement. (Main point is best captured in the final paragraph and also signaled in the first paragraph’s focus on “how” the party attracted Black workers.)

P1: Kelley’s Unique Approach

Kelley isn’t worried about whether communism was theoretically sound—he wants to know how it actually worked “on the ground” in Black communities, and what made it useful for organizing African-American workers.

P2: Typical vs. Kelley’s Focus

Most historians who defend the Communist Party in this period highlight its alliances with liberal groups, but Kelley shifts the focus to the perspective of African-American organizers, where these alliances actually look less positive.

P3: Third Period vs. Popular Front

Kelley claims the earlier, more radical “Third Period” was actually a better fit for rallying Black workers. While its rhetoric sounded extreme, Black party members weren’t just grandstanding—they found strength in bold language and saw the party (with help from international movements) as a powerful ally against oppression.

18.

The primary purpose of the second paragraph is to

  1. Correct

    contrast Kelley's viewpoint on the

    Why this is right

    I wouldn't feel like I could pull the trigger on this answer on the first pass, because P2 doesn't really elaborate on Kelley's view of the Popular Front. It felt more like the Popular Front wasn't a good fit for the specific topic Kelley wanted to explore. But there is a contrast there. Lots of previous scholars found the Popular Front to be suitable to their purposes (seeking models of unity between radicals and liberals), whereas Kelley didn't find it suitable to his purposes (showing how good the Communist Party was at organizing African-Americans). Ultimately, this answer is more defensible than the others, even if it's a little weird on its own.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

  2. defend the Popular Front from

    Out of Scope (Kelley's attacks)

    Kelley never attacks the Popular Front, and the author certainly doesn't do any defending in P2. There are no author views expressed in P2, other than saying "while a lot of scholars chose to focus on this period, this period wasn't as useful for what Kelley wanted to focus on".

    1% picked this

  3. question the political usefulness of

    Out of Scope (questioning the usefulness)

    The author mentions that many scholars were searching for models of unity between radicals and liberals, but she never impugns the political usefulness of doing that. There isn't any judgy pushback. In fact, the author seems to be sympathetic to what those scholars were doing, by saying "this is an understandable viewpoint for historians searching for models of unity". The passage is never really concerned with what approach to studying the Communist Party would be politically useful.

    2% picked this

  4. enumerate the differences between the

    Out of Support Window (Third Period)

    The Third Period hasn't even been mentioned yet, so there's no way that P2 could enumerate (i.e. list out) the differences between Popular Front and Third Period.

    5% picked this

  5. argue that one valid way

    Out of Scope (valid way)

    The author doesn't reveal any opinions in P2, so she isn't making any argument. She is informing us that Kelley is approaching the study of communism in the U.S. by looking at its impact on organizing African-American workers, but there aren't any sentiments in P2 where the author endorses this or argues that it's a valid goal.

    7% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free