Logical Reasoning

PT107 · S4 · Q6 Some judges complain about statutes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Some judges complain about statutes that specify mandatory minimum sentences for criminal offenses.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

6.

Which one of the following sentences most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

  1. People believe that they have

    Trap

    2% picked this

  2. Mandatory minimum sentences are too

    Trap

    3% picked this

  3. Judges should be free to

    Trap

    1% picked this

  4. Judges are often arbitrary and

    Trap

    3% picked this

  5. Correct

    Mandatory minimum sentences are needed

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    91% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free