Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT107 S2 P1 Q6 Explanation

Pre-World War I Painters

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

For some years before the outbreak of World War I, a number of painters in different European countries developed works of art that some have described as prophetic: paintings that by challenging viewers’ habitual ways of perceiving the world of the present are thus said to anticipate a future world that would important break with traditions of representational art that stretched back to the Renaissance.

So fundamental is this break with tradition that it is not surprising to discover that these artists—among them Picasso and Braque in France, Kandinsky in Germany, and Malevich in Russia—are often credited with having anticipated not just subsequent developments in the arts, but also the political and social disruptions and upheavals of and not their break with traditional artistic techniques, that constitutes their chief interest and value.

No one will deny that an artist may, just as much as a writer or a politician, speculate about the future and then try to express a vision of that future through making use of a particular style or choice of imagery; speculation about the possibility of war in Europe was certainly only to the eye. The reformation of society was of no interest to them as artists.

It is also important to remember that not all decisive changes in art are quickly followed by dramatic events in the world outside art. The case of Delacroix, the nineteenth-century French painter, is revealing. His stylistic innovations startled his contemporaries—and still retain that power over modern viewers—but most art historians have decided 1830, as opposed to other artists who supposedly told of changes still to come.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

According to the author, the work of the pre–World War I painters described in the passage contains an example of each

Answer choices

  1. Supported3% picked this

    an interest in issues of representation

    We get this at the end of the 3rd paragraph.

  2. Supported1% picked this

    a stylistic break with traditional

    In the 3rd paragraph, the author refers to the aesthetic innovations these painters should be celebrated for, which we understand to be an affirmation of what we heard in the very first paragraph.

  3. Supported5% picked this

    the introduction of new artistic

    Supported In the 3rd paragraph, the author credits these artists with "efforts to create a more 'real' reality than the one that was accessible only to the eye" via solving problems of representation and form. At the end of the 2nd paragraph, these artists are acknowledged for their break with traditional artistic techniques, and since the author never pushes back against that and seems to echo it in the 3rd paragraph, we would assume the author would agree with this assessment.

  4. Supported57% picked this

    the ability to anticipate later

    This is discussed in the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, and again, we are inferring the author's agreement since she never pushes back against this detail.

  5. Correct34% picked this

    the power to predict social

    Why this is right

    The thesis of this whole passage is that "the forward-looking quality is their aesthetic innovations, rather than their power to make clever guesses about political or social trends", so we have a compelling reason to think the author would not believe this. If we didn't have such strong negative support for this answer, it would be tough to sign off on (C) and (D) which are both language introduced in the 2nd paragraph and attributed to other people. In essence, (C) / (D) / (E) were all claims made by other people, but our author only goes after this one in (E).

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free