Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT106 S4 P1 Q4 Explanation

Native American Land Claims

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Some Native American tribes have had difficulty establishing their land claims because the United States government did not recognize their status as tribes; therefore during the 1970's some Native Americans attempted to obtain such recognition through the medium of U.S. courts. In presenting these suits, Native Americans had to operate within a perceptions and definitions that can exist between cultures whose systems of discourse are sometimes at variance.

In one instance, the entire legal dispute turned on whether the suing community—a group of Mashpee Wampanoag in the town of Mashpee, Massachusetts—constituted a tribe. The area had long been occupied by the Mashpee, who continued to have control over land use after the town's incorporation. But in the 1960's after an ruling: a body of Native Americans "governing themselves under one leadership and inhabiting a particular territory."

The town claimed that the Mashpee were not self-governing and that they had no defined territory: the Mashpee could legally be self-governing, the town argued, only if they could show written documentation of such a system, and could legally inhabit territory only if they had precisely delineated its boundaries and possessed a discourse between cultures can sometimes stand in the way of guaranteeing the fairness of legal decisions.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Based on the passage, which one of the following can most reasonably be said to have occurred in the years

Answer choices

  1. Trap1% picked this

    The Mashpee have now regained control over the land

  2. Trap0% picked this

    Native American tribes have won all of their land claim suits

  3. Trap2% picked this

    U.S. courts no longer abide by the statute requiring federal approval of

  4. Correct93% picked this

    U.S. courts have become more likely to accept oral testimony as evidence in

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Trap4% picked this

    U.S. courts have changed their definition of what legally constitutes

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free