Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT105 S4 Q6 Explanation

Willett: Lopez and Simmons, a

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Willett: Lopez and Simmons, a married couple, have both been offered jobs at Evritech Corporation. Because Evritech has a rule against hiring more than one member of the same family, Lopez and Simmons have decided to reveal their marriage to Evritech. Their decision is foolish, however, since it will mean that one hired: Evritech has no policy of terminating one of two employees who marry each other.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

The main conclusion of Willett's argument

Answer choices

  1. Trap0% picked this

    Lopez and Simmons should not both have applied for jobs at

  2. Trap1% picked this

    Evritech Corporation's rule against hiring more than one member of the same family is

  3. Correct91% picked this

    Lopez and Simmons would be unwise to reveal their marriage to Evritech Corporation without already having

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Trap1% picked this

    Evritech Corporation should be willing to employ two members of the same family if it is willing to retain two of its

  5. Trap7% picked this

    Evritech Corporation is not likely to discover the marital status of Lopez and Simmons if they do

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free