Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT105 S1 Q5 Explanation

Large discount chains can make

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Large discount chains can make a profit even while offering low prices, because they buy goods in large quantities at favorable cost. This creates a problem for small retailers. If they try to retain their customers by lowering prices to match those of large discount chains, the result is a lower profit discount chains must offer exceptional service in order to retain their level of profitability.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

The reasoning is flawed because it fails to take into account the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact2% picked this

    not all large discount chains do in fact make

    Can we weaken this argument by saying, "at least one large discount chain does not make a profit"? No. We can only weaken this argument by pointing out that there could be other ways, besides offering exceptional service, that allow a small retailer to retain its customers without lowering its prices.

  2. No Impact5% picked this

    some large discount chains have lower profit margins than do some

    Can we weaken this argument by saying, "at least one large discount chain has a lower profit margin than at least one small retailer?" No. We can only weaken this argument by pointing out that there could be other ways, besides offering exceptional service, that allow a small retailer to retain its customers without lowering its prices. Also, it's already common sense that large discount chains have lower profit margins. Their whole business model is to make pennies over cost but to sell in such high volume that those minor profit margins still add up to big profits.

  3. No Impact7% picked this

    small retailers are often motivated by things other than the desire

    Can we weaken this argument by saying, "Often, small retailers aren't super worried about profit?" No, because this conclusion isn't claiming or assuming that all small retailers care about retaining their level of profitability. It's only claiming that if a small retailer did want to compete with a big box store while retaining current profitability, it would be required that they offer exceptional service.

  4. No Impact6% picked this

    not all small retailers are forced to compete with large

    Can we weaken this argument by saying, "At least one small retailer isn't forced to compete with a large discount chain"? No, because this conclusion isn't claiming or assuming that all small retailers are forced to compete with large discount chains. It's only claiming that if a small retailer does have to compete with a big box store while retaining current profitability, it would be required that they offer exceptional service.

  5. Correct79% picked this

    exceptional service is not the only reason customers prefer small

    Why this is right

    This answer doesn't prove the conclusion wrong; it doesn't prove that there is another way to retain profitability and customers, while competing with a big-box store. But to Weaken an argument you don't have to prove the conclusion wrong. You just have to create some doubt, or score a point for the Defense attorney. If there are other things besides exceptional service that make people prefer a small retail store over a large discount chain, then that opens up the possibility that you don't have to have exceptional service to compete with a large discount chain. You could possibly have some of these other advantages that small retail stores have (better location? closer to other stores? easier to get in / get out with what you were looking for?) and still compete.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free