Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT102 S1 P2 Q12 Explanation

Studies of Homer

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

While a new surge of critical interest in the ancient Greek poems conventionally ascribed to Homer has taken place in the last twenty years or so, it was nonspecialists rather than professional scholars who studied the poetic aspects of the Iliad and the Odyssey between, roughly, 1935 and 1970. During these years, critics “are rather Philosophical, Historical, Geographical . . . or rather anything than Critical and Poetical.”

Ironically, the modern manifestation of this “nonpoetical” emphasis can be traced to the profoundly influential work of Milman Parry, who attempted to demonstrate in detail how the Homeric poems, believed to have been recorded nearly three thousand years ago, were the products of a long and highly developed tradition of oral poetry scholars away from the poems into the rapidly developing field of Homer’s archaeological and historical background.

Appropriately, Milman Parry’s son Adam was among those scholars responsible for a renewed interest in Homer’s poetry as literary art. Building on his father’s work, the younger Parry argued that the Homeric poems exist both within and against a tradition. The Iliad and the Odyssey were, Adam Parry thought, the beneficiaries of belief in a strong inherited tradition, but also by emphasizing Homer’s unique contributions within that tradition.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

According to the passage, which one of the following is true of Milman Parry’s immediate successors in the

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted, in part9% picked this

    They reconciled Homer’s poetry with archaeological and

    Milman died. Then his immediate successors started doing X (focusing on the creative limitations/possibilities of oral composition). Then the scholars who hated X started doing Y (archaeological/historical stuff). This answer deals more with Y. But the question seems to be asking about X. Furthermore, both the X people and the Y people were all ignoring Homer's poetry itself. So the fact that this answer says that the Y people were reconciling Homer's poetry" with archaeology/history goes against the idea that everyone in this 2nd paragraph had a nonpoetical emphasis.

  2. Contradicted24% picked this

    They acknowledged the tradition of oral poetry, but focused on the uniqueness of Homer’s poetry

    The people following Milman's death are famous in this passage for starting the nonpoetical emphasis phase from 1935-1970. This answer is saying that they "focused on the uniqueness of Homer's poetry". That didn't happen until Adam Parry in the post-1970 phase.

  3. Wrong POV4% picked this

    They occupied themselves with the question of what qualities made for

    This answer refers to Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach, who were not among the academic scholars what were successors to Parry. The successors to Parry are famous in this passage for their nonpoetical emphasis, so it wouldn't match for them to be "occupying themselves with the question of what makes for great poetry".

  4. Correct60% picked this

    They emphasized the boundaries of oral

    Why this is right

    This is the answer we can best derive from our available supporting text. All we hear about Parry's successors comes from this sentence: But after Parry's death in 1935, his legacy was taken up by scholars who ... focused instead on only one element of Parry's work: the creative limitations and possibilities of oral composition. If they were focused on the limitations of oral composition, then it's a fair paraphrase to say that they emphasized the boundaries of oral poetry.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Wrong POV3% picked this

    They called for a revival of

    This describes the people in the post-1970, featured in the final paragraph. "Adam Parry helped prepare the ground for the recent Homeric revival". We're being asked about Milman Parry's successors, the 1935-1970 crew who eschewed looking at Homer's poetry.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free