Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT102 S1 P2 Q13 Explanation

Studies of Homer

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

While a new surge of critical interest in the ancient Greek poems conventionally ascribed to Homer has taken place in the last twenty years or so, it was nonspecialists rather than professional scholars who studied the poetic aspects of the Iliad and the Odyssey between, roughly, 1935 and 1970. During these years, critics “are rather Philosophical, Historical, Geographical . . . or rather anything than Critical and Poetical.”

Ironically, the modern manifestation of this “nonpoetical” emphasis can be traced to the profoundly influential work of Milman Parry, who attempted to demonstrate in detail how the Homeric poems, believed to have been recorded nearly three thousand years ago, were the products of a long and highly developed tradition of oral poetry scholars away from the poems into the rapidly developing field of Homer’s archaeological and historical background.

Appropriately, Milman Parry’s son Adam was among those scholars responsible for a renewed interest in Homer’s poetry as literary art. Building on his father’s work, the younger Parry argued that the Homeric poems exist both within and against a tradition. The Iliad and the Odyssey were, Adam Parry thought, the beneficiaries of belief in a strong inherited tradition, but also by emphasizing Homer’s unique contributions within that tradition.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following best describes the organization of

Answer choices

  1. Correct73% picked this

    A situation is identified and its origins

    Why this is right

    Paragraph 1 definitely identifies a situation (critics were studying non-poetical things about Homer) and Paragraph 2 identifies the origins of this situation (Milman Parry showed how Homeric poems were the products of a long and highly developed tradition of oral poetry). This answer certainly isn't lovable on a first pass, since nothing in the answer choice describes what happens in the last sentence, but ultimately this is the best available answer.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope: series of hypotheses4% picked this

    A series of hypotheses is reviewed and one

    A hypothesis is an attempt to explain a phenomenon. Why do dogs hate being forced into the shower? My hypothesis is that falling water reminds them of rain, and their evolutionary instinct when they feel rain is to get under cover. This passage involved the author describing a situation, what originally caused it, and what ultimately caused it to end. We wouldn't call either of those causal relationships a "hypothesis" because they're not a guess. The author is telling us what caused the nonpoetical emphasis to start and what caused it to end. She's not hypothesizing about what might have caused it to start / end. There are also at most two causal relationships, whereas a series of hypotheses would mean at least three. And the author is never advocating that one is true while the others aren't. She thinks that all the causal relationships she presents are true ones.

  3. Too Narrow8% picked this

    The works of two influential scholars

    We could potentially say that Milman Parry and his son were both influential scholars. But we couldn't say that the passage summarizes their work. The 1st paragraph has nothing to do with either of them. The 2nd paragraph spends its first two sentences describing Milman Parry's work. The 3rd paragraph spends two sentences describing Adam's work. That's not enough time spent mentioning their work to call that the central ideas of the passage. We know that the main event was the curious situation described in the first paragraph, in which poetry critics were focusing on nonpoetical parts of Homer's poetry.

  4. Out of Scope: current debate14% picked this

    Several issues contributing to a current debate

    There's no current debate going on. The author is just telling us a story about a funky phase from 1935-1970.

  5. Out of Scope: problem / solutions1% picked this

    Three possible solutions to a long-standing problem

    This wasn't a Problem / Solution passage. If we were to call the silly 1935-1970 nonpoetical phase a Problem (the author definitely found it dumb that critics weren't studying Homer's poetry itself), then the "Solution" would be the final paragraph, when Adam Parry led critics out of this dumb phase. But there definitely wouldn't be three solutions considered.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free