Reading Comprehension

PT102 · S1 · P1 · Q1 Office Email Privacy

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Most office workers assume that the messages they send to each other via electronic mail are as private as a telephone call or a face-to-face meeting.

Topic

The privacy (or lack thereof) of electronic mail in the workplace and government, and the complex legal and ethical issues surrounding it.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

E-mail is far less private than most people assume, and while there's a lot of legal confusion and ongoing debate about privacy rights in different contexts, the only real way to ensure privacy is to use inconvenient encryption. (Best encapsulated at the end of para 1 and the last two sentences of the passage: "That assumption is wrong..." and )

P1: Introduction & The Core Problem

Most people think work e-mails are private, like calls or in-person talks, but that's incorrect. Laws protect other communications, but not clearly e-mails yet, making e-mail privacy a thorny legal issue.

P2: Government E-mail Controversies

Privacy expectations for government emails are debated—some want officials able to delete records, arguing paper copies exist, but others counter that digital records contain unique info and should be public since civil servants work for the people.

P3: Private Sector Example—No Privacy for Employees

A real-world example: Employees were fired for using work e-mail to criticize a boss. The company legally won because the computers belonged to the employer, not the staff, so supervisors could monitor messages.

1.

Which one of the following statements most accurately summarizes the main point of the passage?

  1. Until the legal questions surrounding

    Too Strong: will need to scramble

    The main clause of this answer is "office workers will need to scramble their emails". That's a poor match for what we were looking for, which was more like: "this whole issue of email privacy is a thorny modern issue with no easy answers". The author says in the last sentence that "the only solution may be for users to scramble their own messages". Not only is this line more tenuous than this answer: "the only solution is for users to scramble their messages", the author also wasn't saying in that line that all office workers should scramble their messages. It was more like, "there's no real guarantee that you have privacy, so if you want to know your email won't be read by others, you may need to scramble your messages."

    6% picked this

  2. The legal questions surrounding the

    Out of Scope: best resolved

    This answer also implies that the author offered an answer / solution to this tough, complicated problem. If we treated email privacy like private conversations or telephone calls, that would mean that it would be illegal in many cases for an employer to eavesdrop, even if the company owns the email system. Did this author advocate that it should be illegal for companies to "eavesdrop" emails on company-owned email systems? No, the author says in the 3rd paragraph that a boss's right to eavesdrop on a company owned computer system was upheld by courts and in the 4th paragraph that courts have ruled that if employees haven't been given a 'reasonable expectation' of privacy when they send messages, then those messages shouldn't be considered private. The author doesn't react to either of these things by saying, "This is wrong. This should be changed."

    2% picked this

  3. Any attempt to resolve the

    Too Strong: must Wrong Emphasis

    The main clause here is, "Attempt to solve the legal issues of email privacy must take into account the difference between public and private". That was the author's #1 thing? She wanted to make sure above all else that as people try to solve this problem they make sure to factor in that public/private distinction? There's nothing we can point to in the passage where the author is emphasizing / recommending / suggesting that lawmakers make sure to account for this distinction. This answer is just trying to bait us by using the words public and private because the author explored how this debate manifests in public settings as well as in private settings.

    4% picked this

  4. Correct

    At present, in both the

    Why this is right

    This answer, more than any other one, resembles our thesis at the end of paragraph 1. The author is highlighting a problem without any clear solution, a debate without any clear correct answer. The author sets us up by saying, "This email privacy thing has emerged as one of the more complicated legal issues of our modern age", and concludes by saying, "The only solution may be X; unfortunately, X sucks as a solution." So that leaves us with a main point that is basically just, "I'm going to inform you about a tricky legal matter that people are currently struggling with".

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    89% picked this

  5. The legal questions surrounding the

    Out of Scope: best resolved

    This answer also implies that the author offered an answer / solution to this tough, complicated problem. If we followed the advice in this answer, that would mean that it would be illegal for a private employer to eavesdrop, even if the company owns the email system. Did this author advocate that it should be illegal for companies to "eavesdrop" emails on company-owned email systems? No, the author says in the 3rd paragraph that a boss's right to eavesdrop on a company owned computer system was upheld by courts and in the 4th paragraph that courts have ruled that if employees haven't been given a 'reasonable expectation' of privacy when they send messages, then those messages shouldn't be considered private. The author doesn't react to either of these things by saying, "This is wrong. This should be changed."

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free