Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT101 S3 Q17 Explanation

The argument in the passage proceeds

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The widespread staff reductions in a certain region’s economy are said to be causing people who still have their jobs to cut back on new purchases as though they, too, had become economically distressed. Clearly, however, actual spending by such people is undiminished, because there of money held by those people in savings account.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The argument in the passage proceeds by doing which one of

Answer choices

  1. Correct75% picked this

    concluding that since an expected consequence of a supposed development did not occur, that development itself

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap8% picked this

    concluding that since only one of the two predictable consequences of a certain kind of behavior is observed to occur, this observed occurrence cannot,

  3. Trap2% picked this

    arguing that since people’s economic behavior is guided by economic self-interest, only misinformation or error will cause people to engage in economic

  4. Trap4% picked this

    arguing that since two alternative developments exhaust all the plausible possibilities, one of those developments occurred and

  5. Trap10% picked this

    concluding that since the evidence concerning a supposed change is ambiguous, it is most likely that no change

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free