Reading Comprehension

PT101 · S1 · P2 · Q12 Pico Workers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In April 1990 representatives of the Pico Korea Union of electronics workers in Buchon City, South Korea, traveled to the United States in order to demand just settlement of their claims from the parent company of their employer, who upon the formation of the union had shut down operations without paying the workers.

Topic

The impact of the Pico Korea Union workers' campaign on the Korean American community, and its broader social implications.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

The Pico workers’ struggle in the US united and empowered the Korean American community across various divisions, illustrating that active engagement in social justice struggles can meaningfully strengthen ethnic identity and foster broader political alliances. The most valuable sentence for the main point is in the final paragraph:

P1: Introduction to the Pico Campaign and Its Local Support

We learn about South Korean workers who came to the US in 1990 to seek compensation and justice after their company shut down. Their cause was taken up by an unprecedented coalition of Korean American groups, which had a major impact on the Korean American community.

P2: Effects on the Korean American Community and New Alliances

The Pico struggle became a unifying force for a usually divided community, notably drawing in young, second-generation Korean Americans and inspiring them to engage with their cultural roots. It also showcased the important roles recent working-class immigrants could play and helped foster alliances between Korean Americans and various progressive groups outside their own community.

P3: Why the Pico Cause Was So Unifying

The passage explains that the cause was so effective because it centered on universal human issues—social justice and workers’ rights—rather than ideology. This allowed the Pico campaign to resonate broadly across different groups within and beyond the Korean American community.

12.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

describe recent developments in the
Out of Scope: recent developments
This passage is telling a story about something that happened in 1990 that affected the Korean American community. Does that count as "a recent development in the Korean American community"? Also, why would we say "recent developments", plural? This passage is about one story of the Pico Union coming to America and gaining the support of Korean Americans. Finally, while the "lesson" in the last paragraph potentially applies to other ethnic communities of immigrant derivation, the passage doesn't contain a story in which the Korean American community strongly affected other ethnic communities. The closest we come is saying that the Pico workers from Korea had a warm exchange with some immigrants from China.
2% picked this
Correct
describe a situation in the
Why this is right
The passage is telling the story of the Pico Union coming to the U.S. and galvanizing "an unprecedented coalition of Korean American groups", and in the final paragraph the author turns this story into a lesson. The Pico workers' campaign thus offers an important lesson. It demonstrates that ethnic communities need more than X. It shows that perhaps the most effective means of empowerment for many ethnic communities of immigrant derivation may be Y." "Offers a lesson" = presents a model
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
75% picked this
detail the problems faced by
Out of Scope: detail the problems
The second half of this answer matches the end of the passage (just like in choice B), but the first half doesn't match the rest of the passage. The rest of the passage is telling the story of the Pico Union workers' trip to the U.S. and their support among the Korean American community. The passage never "details the problems faced by the Korean American community".
11% picked this
argue against economic and social
Out of Scope: injustice in Korea
This answer would basically be saying that the primary purpose of this passage was for the author to yell at the corporation in Korea that shut down operations when they found out their workers were unionizing. The author never talks about the parent company other than in the first sentence of the passage. The passage is focused on what's happening in America, for Korean Americans, not what's happening in Korea (the "country of origin" for this ethnic community).
1% picked this
assess the impact of the
Out of Scope: unionization movement
We only know about this one group of workers that were trying to unionize and ended flying to America to fight their parent employer. The passage never talks about any broader unionization movement . The author is assessing the impact of the Pico Workers' union on the Korean American community (and ends up extrapolating that a unifying force such as this can be good for ethnic communities of immigrant derivation -- but the unifying force doesn't need to have anything to do with unions).
12% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free