Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT9 S2 Q1 Explanation

Crimes in which handguns are used

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Crimes in which handguns are used are more likely than other crimes to result in fatalities. However, the majority of crimes in which handguns are used do not result in fatalities. Therefore, there is no need involving handguns as distinct from other crimes.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Conclusion

The author concludes: no special laws for handgun crimes.

Evidence

Two facts: (1) handgun crimes are more likely than other crimes to be deadly, and (2) most handgun crimes still aren't deadly.

Evaluate

The flaw is using the "most aren't deadly" fact to wave away the higher-risk fact. But for the question of whether something deserves special attention, what matters is the elevated risk — not the absolute majority. Most car accidents don't kill people either, but driving recklessly is still more dangerous than driving carefully. The relative risk is the policy-relevant fact, not the absolute frequency.

Goal

Find the answer with the same shape: higher risk for X to cause Y, most X don't cause Y, so no special concern needed.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

The pattern of flawed reasoning displayed in the argument above most closely resembles that in which one

Answer choices

  1. Correct95% picked this

    Overweight people are at higher risk of developing heart disease than other people. However, more than half of all overweight people never develop heart

    Why this is right

    Same flawed pattern. Overweight people are at higher risk of heart disease (matches: handgun crimes are higher-risk for fatalities). More than half of overweight people never develop heart disease (matches: most handgun crimes don't result in fatalities). Therefore physicians don't need to emphasize the danger more to overweight patients (matches: no need for distinct laws). The flaw is identical — using the absolute-majority fact to dismiss the elevated-relative-risk fact.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Validity Match1% picked this

    Many people swim daily in order to stay physically fit. Yet people who swim daily increase their risk of developing ear infections. Hence people

    This argument concludes that swimmers should avoid swimming because of an associated risk (ear infections). Direction is opposite — it recommends more caution, not less. The original concludes against special attention; this concludes for avoiding the activity. Different structure.

  3. Bad Validity Match4% picked this

    Most physicians recommend a balanced diet for those who want to remain in good health. Yet many people find that nontraditional dietary regimens such

    This argument concludes there's no need to avoid nontraditional regimens, because they don't do serious harm. There's no setup with a higher-relative-risk fact being dismissed; the structure is "no harm shown → no need to avoid." Different shape.

  4. Bad Validity Match0% picked this

    Foods rich in cholesterol and fat pose a serious health threat to most people. However, many people are reluctant to give up eating foods

    This argument concludes that people who refuse to give up rich foods need to exercise more — that's a recommendation for more action in response to risk, not less. There's no parallel to the dismissal of elevated risk in the original.

  5. Bad Validity Match0% picked this

    Many serious health problems are the result of dietary disorders. Yet these disorders are often brought about by psychological factors. Hence people suffering from

    This argument has a chain about causes (health problems → dietary disorders → psychological factors) and recommends psychological evaluation. There's no "higher-risk-but-most-don't" pattern, and no dismissal of elevated risk. Different structure.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free