Crimes in which handguns are used are more likely than other crimes to result in fatalities. However, the majority of crimes in which handguns are used do not result in fatalities. Therefore, there is no need involving handguns as distinct from other crimes.
What this question is testing
Conclusion
The author concludes: no special laws for handgun crimes.
Evidence
Two facts: (1) handgun crimes are more likely than other crimes to be deadly, and (2) most handgun crimes still aren't deadly.
Evaluate
The flaw is using the "most aren't deadly" fact to wave away the higher-risk fact. But for the question of whether something deserves special attention, what matters is the elevated risk — not the absolute majority. Most car accidents don't kill people either, but driving recklessly is still more dangerous than driving carefully. The relative risk is the policy-relevant fact, not the absolute frequency.
Goal
Find the answer with the same shape: higher risk for X to cause Y, most X don't cause Y, so no special concern needed.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.