Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT7 S4 Q20 Explanation

Graphologists claim that it is

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people’s handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the “t” is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this hold that permanent character traits can be changed.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The argument against graphology proceeds

Answer choices

  1. Correct71% picked this

    citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap4% picked this

    demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just

  3. Trap15% picked this

    arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that

  4. Trap6% picked this

    showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for

  5. Trap4% picked this

    attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free